DHARTI FOUNDATION,SABARKANTHA vs. THE DY.DIT, CPC PRESENT JURIS. THE ITO, EXEMPTION, PALANPUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal found that the issue of granting TDS credit necessitated proper verification and reconciliation between the receipts reflected in Form 26AS and the income offered to tax in the return. Consequently, in the interest of justice, the matter was restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh examination and verification of the TDS claim as per the provisions of the Act.
What were the facts?
The assessee, Dharti Foundation (a resident trust), claimed TDS credit of Rs. 3,34,690/- in its return, which was reflected in Form 26AS. However, the CPC, while processing the return under section 143(1) and subsequently rectifying it under section 154, allowed only Rs. 26,697/-. The CIT(A) dismissed the assessee's appeal, citing a significant discrepancy between the income reflected in Form 26AS (Rs. 46,12,020/-) and the total income declared in the return (Rs. 3,34,690/-), indicating that the entire income from 26AS was not offered to tax.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in upholding the disallowance of TDS credit due to a mismatch between income declared in the return and receipts reflected in Form 26AS, requiring proper verification and reconciliation by the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 154,Section 143(1),Section 199(2),Section 194A,Section 194C
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “ SMC ” BENCH, AHMEDABAD
Before: MS SUCHITRA KAMBLE
PER SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JM:
The captioned appeal has been filed at the instance of the Assessee against the order dated 04.09.2025 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), Thane arising in the matter of assessment order passed under s. 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2022-23. Asst. Year 2022-23
2
The assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal:
The Ld.CIT(A) erred in law and facts of the case, in sustaining the
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 154
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Rakesh Kumar Malani, JaipurITA 1425/JPR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Income Tax Officer, Jaipur vs Anita Sharma, JaipurITA 1344/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Ramtirath Bawa, Nagpur vs ITO Ward3(4), NagpurITA 327/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Mohinder Singh, Nagpur vs ITO Ward 3(4), NagpurITA 322/NAG/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Ramakrishna Reddy Makireddy, Hyderabad vs ACIT, Circle-5(1), HyderabadITA 70/HYD/2026[2007-08]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2007-08
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026