SHRI RAMTIRTH GODAVARI SEVA SAMITI,NASHIK vs. CIT (EXEMPTION), PUNE, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted a newly inserted proviso to section 12A(1)(ac) (effective 01.10.2024) empowering the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner to condone delays in filing such applications for reasonable cause. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(E)'s order and remanded the matter, directing the CIT(E) to reconsider the application, condone the delay, and decide afresh after providing a proper hearing.
What were the facts?
The assessee applied for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which was rejected by the Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune. The rejection was primarily based on the ground that the assessee, whose activities had already commenced, incorrectly applied under Item 'A' instead of Item 'B' of section 12A(1)(ac)(vi), and also filed the application with a 7-day delay beyond the extended deadline.
What were the issues?
1. Whether the application for registration under section 12AB was rightly rejected by the CIT(E) on the grounds of incorrect sub-clause application and delay. 2. Whether the Commissioner has the power to condone the delay in filing the application for registration in light of the new proviso to section 12A(1)(ac).
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12AB,Section 12A(1)(ac),Section 12A(1)(ac)(iii),Section 12A(1)(ac)(vi),Section 11,Section 12,Section 10(23C)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “B”, PUNE
Before: SHRI MANISH BORAD & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
ORDER
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 11.09.2025 passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejecting the application for registration u/s 12AB of the IT Act.
Facts of the case, in brief, are, that the assessee has applied for registration in Form 10AB under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act on 27.03.2025. After considering the submissions of the assessee, Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune rejected the application filed by the assessee under clause (iii) of section 12A(1)(ac) of the IT Act by observing as under :- “7. As stated in reply dt. 27/08/2025, the date of commencement of activities of the trust is July 2023. It has obtained provisional registration in form 10AC on 08/07/2024 u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) - Item 'A' of the Income- tax Act, 1961. As the activities of the trust were already commenced it was required to file application in form 10AB u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) - Item 'B' of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Said provision is reproduced hereunder for ready reference: "12A(1)(ac) notwithstanding anything contained in clauses (a) to (ab), the person in receipt of the income has made an application in the prescribed form and manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the trust or institution,— (vi) in any other case, where activities of the trust or institution have - (A) not commenced, at least one month prior to the commencement of the previous year relevant to the assessment year from which the said registration is sought; (B) commenced and no income or part thereof of the said trust or institution has been excluded from the total income on account of applicability of sub-clause (iv) or subclause (v) or sub-clause (vi) or sub-clause (via) of clause (23C) of section 10, or section 11 or section 12, for any previous year ending on or before the date of such application, at any time after the commencement of such activities."
As stated by the assessee, its activities were commenced much before obtaining the provisional registration in form 10AC on 08/07/2024. Therefore, it was required to file application u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) - Item 'B' of the Income-tax Act, 1961.”
It is this order against which the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal.
We have heard Ld. Counsels from both the sides and perused the material available on record including the paper book furnished by the assessee wherein copy of acknowledgement of application seeking post facto permission from Charity Commissioner, Nashik is also enclosed. In this regard, we find that CBDT vide Circular No.7/2024 dated 25-04-2024 considered & acknowledged the issue of wrong section code & already gave relaxation to the assessee to file application upto 30.06.2024 and the assessee has applied on 08.07.2024 i.e. with a delay of 7 days. Admittedly the provisional registration u/s 12A(1)(ac)(vi) was granted to the assessee on 08.07.2024 for the period starting from assessment year 2025-26 to assessment year 2027-28. As per section 12A(1)(ac)(iii), the assessee was required to apply for final registration at least six months prior to expiry of provisional registration or within six months from commencement of its activities whichever is earlier. In this regard, we find that w.e.f. 01.10.2024 a proviso is inserted in section 12A(1)(ac) which reads as under :- “12A. (1) The provisions of section 11 and section 12 shall not apply in relation to the income of any trust or institution unless the following conditions are fulfilled, namely:— xxxxx (ac) notwithstanding anything contained in clauses (a) to (ab), the person in receipt of the income has made an application in the prescribed form and manner to the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner, for registration of the trust or institution,— (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) [Provided that where the application is filed beyond the time allowed in sub-clauses (i) to (vi), the Principal Commissioner or Commissioner may, if he considers that there is a reasonable cause for delay in filing the application, condone such delay and such application shall be deemed to have been filed within time;]”
Accordingly, in the light of above proviso, we find that the Commissioner has been empowered to condone the delay, therefore, we deem it appropriate to set-aside the order passed by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune and remand the matter back to him with a direction to condone the delay and decide the application afresh and as per fact and law after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee. The assessee is also hereby directed to respond to the notices issued by Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune in this regard and to furnish documents/evidences and case laws, if any, in support of application for registration without taking any adjournment under any pretext, otherwise Ld. CIT, Exemption, Pune shall be at liberty to pass appropriate orders as per law. Thus,
More judgments on Section 12AB
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sheo Narayan Trust, Khajpura vs CIT Exemption, PatnaITA 554/PAT/2026[2025-2026]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-2026
- Ss Early Learning Society, Hyderabad vs CIT (Exemption), HyderabadITA 1208/HYD/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 592/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
- Shri Brajshiromani Laxmandas Sewa Trust… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(1), Mathura…ITA 591/AGR/2026[2026-2027]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2026-2027
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026