SHREE GANESH POWER TECH,ANGUL vs. ITO, WARD, ANGUL

PDF
ITA 478/CTK/2024Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack23 January 2025AY 2019-20Bench: MA Shree Ganesh Kulad, Nalco N Odisha,759146 pages

No AI summary yet for this case.

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL,

Before: BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHANMANISH AGARWAL

For Appellant: Shri K.C Jena, CA
For Respondent: Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR, Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR
Hearing: 23/01/20Pronounced: 23/01/20

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH, CUTTACK BEFORE BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER AND MANISH AGARWAL MANISH AGARWAL, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER , ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA No.478/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-2020 Shree Ganesh Power Tech Shree Ganesh Power Tech Vs. ITO Ward, Angul ITO Ward, Angul Kulad, Nalco Nagar, Angul, co Nagar, Angul, Odisha,759145 Odisha,759145 PAN/GIR No. No.ABPFS 641 3D (Appellant (Appellant) .. ( Respondent Respondent) Assessee by : Shri K.C Jena, CA Revenue by : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR : Shri S.C.Mohanty, Sr DR Date of Hearing : 23/01/20 2025 Date of Pronouncement : 23/01/20 025 O R D E R Per Bench This is an This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the l appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the ld Addl/JCIT(A), Addl/JCIT(A), Thane Thane dated 18.9.2024 18.9.2024 in Appeal No.ADDL/JCIT(A),Thane/10001/2018 ADDL/JCIT(A),Thane/10001/2018-19 for the assessment year essment year 2019- 20.

2.

Shri K.C.Jena K.C.Jena, ld AR appeared for the assessee and Shri the assessee and Shri S.C.Mohanty , Sr. DR appeared for the revenue. DR appeared for the revenue.

3.

Grounds Of Appeal are as under: Grounds Of Appeal are as under:

P a g e 1 | 6

ITA No.478/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-2020

“1.On the facts and circumstances of the case learned ADDL/JCIT(A) erred on facts and in law in not considering the revised tax audit report filed on 24.06.2020 to remove the employees contributions of provident fund and ESI as the assessee has not deducted these statutory dues. 2.On the facts and circumstances of the case learned ADDL/JCIT(A) erred on facts and in law in not considering the fact that intimation u/s 143(1) is not an order and revised audit report has been filed before due date of completion of assessment. 3.On the facts and circumstances of the case learned ADDL/JCIT(A) erred on facts and in law in taking a view on filing of appeal belatedly only after issuing notice to submit written submissions. 4. On the facts and circumstances of the case learned ADDL/JCIT(A) erred on facts and in law in not considering filing of appeal on 17.06.2023 i.e. within due date after receipt of the intimation u/s 143(1) of I.T. Act on dated 30.05.2023. 5.On the facts and circumstances of the case learned ADDL/JCIT(A) erred on facts and in law in confirming the order of Id. Assistant Director of Income Tax, CPC in not giving opportunity to the assessee to clarify on the additions made before such additions in intimation u/s 143(1) of I.T. Act.” 4. We have considered the rival submissions and perused the record of the case. A perusal of the order of the ld JCIT(A) Tahne clearly shows that ld JCIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee by not condoning the delay of 749 days. However, if the period in regard to COVID19 is excluded, the delay would be from 1.3.2022 to 17.6.2023. The assessee has also filed explanation on 17.7.2024 before the JCIT(A) explaining the reasons for the delay. The reasons furnished by the assessee are found to be plausible and not false. The reasons given by the assessee are as follows:

P a g e 2 | 6

ITA No.478/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-2020

P a g e 3 | 6

ITA No.478/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-2020

P a g e 4 | 6

ITA No.478/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-2020

5.

This being so, in the interest of justice, the delay in filing of appeal before the ld JCIT(A), Thane is condoned and the issues are restored to his file for fresh adjudication on merits after allowing adequate opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee stands partly allowed for statistical purposes.

Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 23/01/2025.

Sd/- sd/- (Manish Agarwal) (George Mathan) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER Cuttack; Dated 23/01/2025

P a g e 5 | 6

ITA No.478/CTK/2024 Assessment Year : 2019-2020

B.K.Parida, SPS (OS) Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant : Shree Ganesh Power Tech Kulad, Nalco Nagar, Angul, Odisha,759145

2.

The Respondent: ITO Ward, Angul 3. The JCIT(A)- Thane 4. Pr.CIT, 5. DR, ITAT, 6. Guard file. By order //True Copy//

Sr.Pvt.Secretary ITAT, CUTTACK

P a g e 6 | 6

SHREE GANESH POWER TECH,ANGUL vs ITO, WARD, ANGUL | BharatTax