DATAR KULMANDAL,PUNE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION), WARD -1, PUNE
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the issue of 12A registration was already restored for de novo adjudication by a coordinate bench. Consequently, it set aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order and restored the matter to the AO for re-assessment de novo, contingent on the fresh decision regarding 12A registration. The Tribunal further clarified that only net profit, not gross receipts, can be taxed even if section 12A registration is not available.
What were the facts?
The Assessee, DatarKulmandal, filed a nil return for A.Y. 2022-23. The Assessing Officer (AO) made an addition of Rs.3,22,574/-, treating gross receipts as undisclosed income and denying exemption under section 11, citing the rejection of registration renewal under section 12A/12AB by CIT Exemption. The Ld. CIT(A) confirmed the AO's order, dismissing the assessee's appeal.
What were the issues?
1. Whether gross receipts can be taxed as undisclosed income when Section 12A registration is denied. 2. Whether the assessment should be reframed de novo pending a decision on Section 12A registration. 3. Whether only net profit or gross receipts are taxable in the absence of Section 12A registration.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 250,Section 143(3),Section 144B,Section 11,Section 12A,Section 12AB,Section 270A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCHES “SMC” :: PUNE
Before: DR.DIPAK P. RIPOTE & SHRI VINAY BHAMORE
PER VINAY BHAMORE, JM : This is an appeal filed by the Assessee against the order of Ld.Commissioner of Income Tax(Appeal)[NFAC], passed under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the A.Y.2022-23dated 17.10.2025 emanating from the Assessment Order passed under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144Bof the I.T.Act, 1961 dated 26.02.2024. ITA No.3239/PUN/2025 [A]
The Assessee has raised the following grounds of appeal :
“1. The learned AO erred in making addition of Rs.3,22,574/- being gross receipts of assessee by denying claim of exemption under
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 144B
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Mohammed Javed Bhati, Sikar vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1, SikarITA 994/JPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2125/AHD/2026[2019-2020]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-2020
- Haresh Sharma, Ahmedabad vs ITO, Ward 5(3)(1), AhmedabadITA 2124/AHD/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Hemal Paresh Madeka, Rajkot vs Asst.Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 955/RJT/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026
- Dr.Sunil Kumar Padhi vs. The Chief Commissioner, GST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- N.K Fashion Through It Proprietor Mr. Narender Agarwal vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Central Goods And Service Tax, Delhi EastDelhi · 14 Oct 2026