Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, JAIPUR BENCHES, JAIPUR
Before: SHRI KUL BHARAT, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM vk;dj vihy la-@ITA No. 530/JP/2015
PER SHRI KUL BHART, JM.
The appeal by the Assessee is directed against the order of ld. CIT (Appeals)-
2, Jaipur dated 27.03.2015 pertaining to assessment year 2010-11. The assessee
has raised the following grounds of appeal :-
“The CIT(A) II has grossly erred in facts as well as in law in confirming the disallowance of Rs. 15100926.00 claimed by the assessee u/s 54F of the Income Tax, Act, 1961. 2. The order passed by the learned CIT(A) II is bad in law, contrary to facts and arbitrary. 3. The assessee prays leave to add, amend or alter grounds of the appeal at or before the time of appeal.”
At the time of hearing no-one appeared on behalf of the assessee. It is
transpired from the record that the appeal was fixed for hearing on 28/3/2016 the
adjournment was sought on behalf of the assessee vide application dated
2 ITA No.530/JP/2015 Shri Navneet Saraf.
15/3/2016. The request of the assessee was accepted and the hearing was adjourned to 23rd May, 2016 on this date also the application for seeking
adjournment was filed dated 16/5/2016. The request of the assessee was accepted
and appeal was adjourned to 21/7/2016. Yet, again an application seeking
adjournment was filed dated 20/7/2016. The appeal was adjourned to 26/9/2016
once again the assessee filed an application seeking adjournment the request was
accepted and the appeal was fixed for hearing on 22/11/2016 on this state also
adjournment application was filed on behalf of the assessee. Today, neither any
application is filed nor anybody appear on behalf of the assessee. In view, of the
facts narrated herein above it appeared that the assessee is not interested in
prosecuting the appeals. Respectfully following the judgments of Hon’ble Delhi High
Court in the case of CIT vs. Multiplan India Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and Hon’ble
Madhya Pradesh High Court in the case of Estate of late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT,
223 ITR 480 (MP), we dismiss the appeal of the assessee for want of prosecution
In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 08/03/2017.
Sd/- Sd/- ( dqy Hkkjr) ¼foØe flag ;kno½ (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) ( KUL BHARAT ) ys[kk lnL;@Accountant Member U;kf;d lnL;@Judicial Member Jaipur Dated:- 08/03/2017. Pooja/ आदेश की प्रतिलिपि अग्रेषित@ब्वचल वf जीम वतकमत वितूंतकमक जवरू 1. The Appellant- Shri Navneet Saraf, Jaipur. 2. The Respondent- The ACIT, Circle-6, Jaipur. 4. The CIT, 5. The DR, ITAT, Jaipur 6. Guard File (ITA No. 530/JP/2015)
3 ITA No.530/JP/2015 Shri Navneet Saraf.
vkns'kkuqlkj@ By order,
सहायक पंजीकार@ Aेेपेजंदज. त्महपेजतंत