SUGAR CANE PRODUCERS VIVIDHA KARYAKARI SAH. SOCIETY LTD,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 1(4), PANDHARPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following its own previous orders for the preceding assessment years and the Supreme Court judgment in Totgar's Cooperative Sale Society Ltd., held that the assessee is entitled to deduction under Section 80P on the interest income earned from investments.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a sugar cane producers' cooperative society, earned interest income from nationalised and private sector banks. The Assessing Officer denied deduction under Section 80P on this interest income, which was upheld by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society from its investments in banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Income-tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL
आदेश / ORDER PER R.S.SYAL, VP :
This appeal by the assessee is arising out of the order passed by the CIT(A)-7, Pune, dated 06-10-2017 in relation to the A.Y. 2014-15.
The only issue raised in this appeal is against the denial of deduction u/s.80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter
2 ITA No.3101/PUN/2017 Sugar Cane Producers Vividha Karyakari Sah. Society Ltd.,
also called `the Act’) in respect of interest earned from
Nationalised and Private Sector banks.
I have heard both the sides and perused the relevant
material on record. Shorn of unnecessary details, it is
observed that the assessee earned interest income amounting
to Rs.13,80,643/- on certain investments/FDRs and claimed
deduction u/s.80P of the Act on interest income as well. The
AO denied the deduction on interest income, which view came
to be upheld in the first appeal. It is observed that similar
issue was raised in the assessee’s appeal for the immediately
preceding assessment years 2012-13 and 2013-14. Vide its
order dated 26-10-2018, the Tribunal in ITA Nos.2537 &
2538/PUN/2017 has allowed deduction on interest income
earned from investments in Fixed Deposits. A copy of such
order has been placed on record. The tribunal has passed the
order after considering the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme
Court in the case of Totgar’s Cooperative Sale Society Ltd.
VS. ITO 322 ITR 283 (SC). The ld. Departmental
Representative fairly admitted that the facts and circumstances
of the instant appeal are mutatis mutandis similar to those of
3 ITA No.3101/PUN/2017 Sugar Cane Producers Vividha Karyakari Sah. Society Ltd.,
preceding years. Respectfully following the view taken by the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the immediately preceding assessment years, I overturn the impugned order on this score and order to grant deduction u/s.80P on such interest income.
In the result, the appeal is allowed.
Order pronounced in the Open Court on 13th November, 2018. Sd/- (R.S.SYAL) उपा�य�/ VICE PRESIDENT उपा�य� उपा�य� उपा�य� पुणे Pune; �दनांक Dated : 13th November, 2018 सतीश आदेश क� क� क� �ितिलिप क� �ितिलिप �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to: अ�ेिषत आदेश आदेश आदेश 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant; 2. ��यथ� / The Respondent; 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT (Appeals)-7, Pune 4. आयकर आयु� / The Pr. CIT-6, Pune 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, पुणे “SMC” / DR ‘SMC’, ITAT, Pune; 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. // True copy // आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, आदेशानुसार आदेशानुसार // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune
ITA No.3101/PUN/2017 Sugar Cane Producers Vividha Karyakari Sah. Society Ltd.,
Date 1. Draft dictated on 12-11-18 2. Draft placed before author 12-11-18 3. Draft proposed & placed before the - second member 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second - Member. 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS 12-11-18 6. Kept for pronouncement on 13-11-18 7. File sent to the Bench Clerk 13-11-18 8. Date on which file goes to the AR 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk. 10. Date of dispatch of Order.
*
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dwaraka Jewellers, Bhubaneswar vs. Superintendent, CGST And Central Excise, BhubaneswarOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S N D Waddar And Co vs. Sri Gaurav GuptaKarnataka · 30 Oct 2026
- Kanwar Enterprises Private Limited vs. The Joint Commissioner - State TaxTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Bangi Mines And Minerals vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 30 Oct 2026
- M/S. Arka Business Solutions vs. Principal Commissioner Of CustomsTelangana · 30 Oct 2026