KANA LAKHA MODHVADIYA,ADITYANA vs. JT CIT, JAMNAGAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal heard both parties and considered the assessee's request for withdrawal. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal. The Tribunal allowed the assessee to withdraw the appeal.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against an order for AY 2016-17, which originated from an Assessing Officer's order dated 25/08/2022 and was further appealed to the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal). The assessee sought to opt for the "Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024" and requested withdrawal of the appeal.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal can be withdrawn by the assessee for opting the "Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024".
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM. &
(�नधा�रणवष� / Assessment Year: (2016-17) (Hybrid Hearing) Kana Lakha Modhvadiya. Vs. The Jt. CIT, Range-1, Ta Ranavav-360545. Jamnagar. �थायीलेखासं./जीआइआरसं./PAN/GIR No.: AGUPM1893M (Respondent) Appellant by : Withdrawal Application by the assessee Respondent by : Shri Abhimanyu Singh Yadav, Ld. Sr. DR Date of Hearing : 27 /01 /2025 Date of Pronouncement : 28 /01 /2025 आदेश / O R D E R PER DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM: Captioned appeal filed by assessee pertaining to Assessment Year 2016-17, is directed against order passed by Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeal), Order dated 14/08/2024, which intern arises out of order passed by Assessing Officer dated 25/08/2022 u/s 271D of The Income Tax Act, 1964.
By way of letter dated 23/12/2024 assessee submitted that he has opted benefit of the “Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024”. Form No.04 dated 16/01/2025 with acknowledgement number 827384341160125 is placed on record and requested for withdrawal of appeal.
On the other hand, the Ld. Sr. DR for the Revenue did not have any objection if the said appeal is withdrawn by the assessee.
ITA-891/RJT/2024 (AY 2016-17) Kana Lakha Modhvadiya Vs. JCIT, Jamnagar.
We have heard both the parties and gone through request of the assessee and noted that assessee has prayed for withdrawal of the appeal. We allow assessee to withdrawal the appeal.
Order pronounced in the open court on 28/01/2025.
More judgments on Section 271D
- Sujatha Vaddanapu, Nalgonda vs ITO, Ward-1, NalgondaITA 2048/HYD/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Inder Lal Ramrakhyani, Dhamtari vs ITO, DhamtariITA 694/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax… vs Harshit Singhania Buildcon, RaipurITA 560/RPR/2026[2022-23]Status: Disposed14 Oct 2026AY 2022-23
- Shree Jalaram Finance, Borsad vs Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(3)(4), PetladITA 1785/AHD/2026[2000-01]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Veera Mani Kumari Vattikooti, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward -11(1), HyderabadITA 1218/HYD/2026[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026