ORISSA RENEWABLE ENERGY DEVELOPMENT AGENCY (OREDA,BHUBANESWAR vs. DCIT 1(1), BHUBANESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, considering the interest of justice and the principles of natural justice, decided to grant the assessee one more opportunity. The issue is restored to the Assessing Officer for a fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal is against an ex-parte order from the Ld. CIT(A). The assessee, despite being given opportunities, did not appear before the lower authorities. The assessee requested one more opportunity to represent its case.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee should be granted another opportunity to present its case before the Assessing Officer.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “CUTTACK” BENCH, CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
The captioned appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeal), NFAC, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “the Ld. CIT(A)”] vide order no. ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2024- 25/1070283051(1) dated 12.11.2024 passed u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for AY 2020-21.
Shri P. R. Mohanty, Advocate represented on behalf of the assessee and Shri S. C. Mohanty, Sr. DR appeared on behalf of the revenue.
The Ld. AR of the assessee submitted before us that both the orders of the lower authorities are ex parte though the authorities below have provided opportunities to the assessee. The Ld. AR of the assessee prayed before the Bench to grant the assessee one more opportunity to represent its case before the Assessing Officer. On the other hand, Ld. Sr. DR objected this prayer of the assessee.
We have heard rival submissions. Since the assessee despite being provided with sufficient opportunities of hearing before the lower authorities did not present itself in the assessment proceeding as well as appellate proceedings, keeping this in mind and also treating this attitude against the principles of natural justice, we are of the view, however, that in the interest of justice, the assessee should be granted one more opportunity. This being so, the issue in this appeal is restored to the file of the Ld. Assessing Officer for adjudication afresh after granting reasonable opportunity of being heard. The assessee is also directed to appear before the Assessing Officer diligently without taking any adjournment.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court.
More judgments on Section 25
- Kumar Gaurav Sharma, Currently Employed in… vs Assessing Officer, PuneITA 598/PUN/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed4 Dec 2025AY 2019-20
- Humana People to People India, Delhi vs DCIT, Circle Exempt 1(1), DelhiITA 5506/DEL/2024[2017-18]Status: Disposed12 Sept 2025AY 2017-18
- Devi Anusuiya Vidya Sansthan, 1812 A B… vs CIT Exemption, BhopalITA 924/IND/2024[2024-25]Status: Disposed18 Jul 2025AY 2024-25
- Devi Anusuiya Vidya Sansthan, A B Road… vs CIT Exemtion, BhopalITA 830/IND/2024[2024-25]Status: Disposed18 Jul 2025AY 2024-25
- Siddhanta Knwledge Foundation, Chennai vs CIT, Exemptions, ChennaiITA 1056/CHNY/2025[-]Status: Disposed12 Jun 2025
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Rishi Stonex vs. The State Of Assam And 5 OthersGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- Gopal Datt vs. Vishal Kumar SharmaUttarakhand · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Do Nam Enterprise And Anr vs. The Union Of INDIA And 2 OrsGauhati · 13 Oct 2026
- M Sundaravel vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of Central GST And Central ExciseMadras · 13 Oct 2026