BABUGARI KAREEM BASHA,KURNOOL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, NANDYAL
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had a delay of 314 days in filing the appeal and failed to provide sufficient cause or supporting evidence for this delay. Citing various Supreme Court judgments, the Tribunal held that delay cannot be condoned without adequate and convincing reasons and that the assessee displayed a casual approach and negligence in pursuing the case.
What were the facts?
The assessee, an individual, failed to file a return of income for AY 2014-15. Based on a suspicious transaction report, it was observed that a sum of Rs.1,10,69,622/- was credited to the assessee's bank account. The Assessing Officer treated this as unexplained money as the assessee provided no valid explanation.
What were the issues?
Whether the delay in filing the appeal by the assessee can be condoned, given the lack of sufficient cause and evidence, and the assessee's negligent conduct.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 142(1),Section 69A,Section 249(3),Section 253(5)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Collector, Land Acquisition v. Mst. Katiji3,926 citing167 ITR 471 · 1987 · SC
- Office of the Chief Post Master General v. Living Media India Ltd.50 citing348 ITR 7 · 2012 · SC
- Balwant Singh (Dead) v. Jagdish Singh47 citing8 SCC 685 · 2010 · SC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad “A” Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशकी प्रनतनलनप अग्रेनर्त/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. निर्धाररती/The : Shri Babugari Kareem Basha, 16-100, Degalapeta (Vill.), Sirivella (Post), Allagadda, Assessee Kurnool 2. रधजस्व/ : The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Nandyal The Revenue 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Kurnool 4. नवभधगीयप्रनतनिनर्, आयकर अपीलीय अनर्करण, हैदरधबधद / DR, ITAT, Hyderabad 5. गधर्ाफ़धईल / Guard file
आदेशधिुसधर / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Dillip Kumar Behera vs. The Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, Mayurbhanj CircleOrissa · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl.Dev Construction vs. The Proper OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Abbal Dass Arya vs. Commissioner State Goods And Services Tax CommissionerUttarakhand · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Darbesh Medical Enterprise vs. State Of West Bengal And Ors.Calcutta · 15 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026