DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE -16(2),HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD vs. MENZIES BOBBA GROUND HANDLING SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED ,HYDERABAD, HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
As per the scheme, the Designated Authority issued Form-2 showing that the assessee had already paid the disputed amount, resulting in a NIL balance payable and an indicated refundable amount. Consequently, both parties agreed that the appeal was not maintainable and should be dismissed as withdrawn.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal against an order for Assessment Year 2015-2016. During the appeal hearing, the assessee informed the tribunal that they had opted for the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024 to settle the dispute.
What were the issues?
Maintainability of the Revenue's appeal in light of the settlement of the dispute under the Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 90 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, Section 91 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024, Section 92 of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2024
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad ‘B’ Bench, Hyderabad
Before: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO & SHRI MANJUNATHA G.
PER VIJAY PAL RAO, VICE PRESIDENT :
This appeal by the Revenue is directed against the Order dated 04.08.2025 of the learned CIT(A)-4, Hyderabad, for the assessment year 2015-2016. 2. At the time of hearing, the learned Authorised Representative of the Assessee has filed an application dated 12.01.2026 and submitted that the assessee has opted for Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme-2024 to settle the dispute involved in this appeal of the department. The Designated Authority has issued Form-2 dated 05.01.2026 whereby the ar
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026