MAMATHA GUBBALA,HYDERABAD vs. ITO., WARD-15(1), HYDERABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that while the CIT(A) has the power to set aside a best judgment assessment under the proviso to Section 251(1)(a), they must first adjudicate on grounds challenging the AO's jurisdiction. The CIT(A) cannot simply set aside the assessment without addressing jurisdictional issues raised by the assessee.
What were the facts?
The Assessing Officer (AO) initiated reassessment proceedings under Section 147 against the assessee for AY 2019-20, as the assessee had not filed a return of income. The AO completed the assessment under Section 144 based on available information. The CIT(A) set aside the assessment to the AO for fresh assessment, citing the proviso to Section 251(1)(a).
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in setting aside the assessment without first deciding the assessee's grounds regarding the AO's lack of jurisdiction to initiate reassessment proceedings.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 147,Section 144,Section 251(1)(a),Section 148A,Section 127
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Hyderabad SMC Bench, Hyderabad
आदेशक���त�ल�पअ�े�षत/ Copy of the order forwarded to:- 1. �नधा�रती/The : Mamatha Gubbala, 7-33, Shanka Nagar, Near Uppal Depot, Peerzadiguda, Hyderabad, Telangana- Assessee 500039. 2. राज�व/ The Revenue : Income Tax Officer, Ward-15(1), IT Towers, AC Guards, Masab Tank, Hyderabad, Telangana- 500004. 3. The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Hyderabad. 4. �वभागीय��त�न�ध, आयकरअपील�यअ�धकरण /DR,ITAT, Hyderabad. 5. The Commissioner of Income Tax 6. गाड�फ़ाईल / Guard file
आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER
Sr. Private Secretary ITAT, Hyderabad.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Ramesh K Devadiga And Ors vs. Khernagar Nandadeep Co-Operative Housing Society LTD And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- Permender Singh vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Abdhish Dhal Samanta, Bhubaneswar vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Kniit Net Industries Private Limited, Khurda vs. Superintendent Of CGST And Central Excise, Bhubaneswar Ii CircleOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Swarnapai Chemicals (Opc) Private Limited, Cuttack vs. Sales Tax Officer, Cuttack IOrissa · 14 Oct 2026