HARESHBHAI RAMJIBHAI RAMANI,,RAJKOT vs. THE PR. CIT -1, RAJKOT
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (PCIT) for assessment year 2014-15. The assessee's representative, through a letter, stated that the assessee did not wish to press the appeal.
Held
The Departmental Representative raised no objection to the assessee's request not to press the appeal. Therefore, the tribunal treated the appeal as withdrawn.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal should be dismissed as withdrawn when the assessee does not wish to press it.
Sections Cited
IT Act sections
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI, AM. &
आदेश / O R D E R
Per, Dr. A. L. SAINI AM;
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, pertaining to assessment year (A.Y.) 2014-15, is directed against the order passed by the Learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Ld. PCIT), vide order dated 28.03.2024.
Before us, the learned Counsel, Shri Digant Kiyada, on behalf of the assessee, by way of a letter dated 25th March 2025, submitted that assessee did
ITA NO. 277/RJT/2024 Hareshbhai R Ramani A.Y 2014-15
not wish to press this appeal, to which, the learned Departmental Representative did not raise any objection. Consequently, we treat this appeal as withdrawn.
In the result, assessee’s appeal is treated as dismissed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 26/03/2025.
Sd/- Sd/- (DINESH MOHAN SINHA) (Dr. A.L. SAINI) JUDICAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER (True Copy) (True Copy) Rajkot �दनांक/ Date: 26/ 03/2025
Copy of the Order forwarded to 1. The Assessee 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. Pr. CIT 5. DR/AR, ITAT, Rajkot 6. Guard File
By Order
Assistant Registrar/Sr. PS/PS ITAT, Rajkot
