MR. ABHIJIT PATTNAIK,KHORDA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, BHAWANIPATNA WARD, BHAWANIPATNA

At the time of hearing, ld AR submitted that the ld CIT(A) has passed the order without affording reasonable opportunity to the assessee for both the assessment years. Ld AR before me produced a paper book containing 205 pages and submitted that these were produced before the AO through the department portal. He submitted that all the relevant documents were filed before the AO but the same were not considered. He submitted that if one more opportunity is given, the assessee would co- operate in set aside proceedings before the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer by filing necessary documentary evidences in support of the claim.

In reply, ld Sr DR submitted that enough opportunities have been granted to the assessee and the AO has passed the order by considering all the facts of the case.

I have heard the rival contentions and perused the material available on record. It is noticed that the quantum appeals for the assessment years 2015-16 & 2014-15 have been passed without affording reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee and the assessment orders have P a g e 2 | 4 Assessment Year : 2015- Assessment Year : 2015-16 Assessment Year : 2014-15 been passed u/s.147/144 of the Act due to non-compliance of the notices issued by the AO. The contention of the ld AR is that all the documentary evidences were produced before the AO. Now, the ld AR has prayed that if one more opportunity is granted, the assessee will produce all the relevant documents and evidences in support of its claim. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the issues in both the quantum appeals are restored to the file of the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication after providing reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.