M/S. TOPGRAIN CORPORATE SERVICE PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O., WARD - 4(1),, KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that disallowance under section 14A cannot be added back while computing book profit under section 115JB, citing previous judicial precedents. The addition made by the Assessing Officer and sustained by the CIT(A) under section 14A was deleted.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed a return declaring a total loss and book profit. The Assessing Officer made additions under section 14A read with Rule 8D to both total income and book profit. The CIT(A) partly allowed the appeal but upheld the additions to book profit and the disallowance under section 14A.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowance under Section 14A can be added to book profit under Section 115JB and whether interest under Sections 234B and 234C are also deleted consequent to deletion of addition.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 14A,Section 115JB,Section 8D,Section 234B,Section 234C,Section 250,Section 10(34),Section 10(38)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” BENCH KOLKATA
Before: Shri Rajesh Kumar & Shri Pradip Kumar Choubey
Per Pradip Kumar Choubey, Judicial Member:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.08.2025 of the Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Chennai (hereinafter referred to as the “CIT(A)”) passed u/s 250 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) for the assessment year 2017–18. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee filed its return of income declaring total loss of Rs.40,527/- and Book Profit at Rs.4,49,73,148/-. Subsequently, the case of the assessee was taken up for
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 14A
- Blacksoil Capital Private Limited (As… vs DCIT, Circle-1(1), HyderabadITA 2217/HYD/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- Hiral Construction, Mumbai vs ITO Ward 42(1)(2), MumbaiITA 8431/MUM/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- The Dy DIT (It) 1(2), Mumbai vs M/S Citi Bank N.A, MumbaiITA 4981/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S. Citi Bank N.A., Mumbai vs The Addl DIT (It) RG-1, MumbaiITA 4970/MUM/2007[2002-2003]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2002-2003
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Tvl. Jeyarani Shopping Centre vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer -1/The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 14 Oct 2026
- Rohan Tanna vs. Directorate General Of Goods And Services Tax IntelligenceChhattisgarh · 14 Oct 2026
- Dipak Saikia vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Saraswati Phukan vs. The Union Of INDIA And 4 OrsGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- Sanjay Maheshwari vs. Union Of INDIA & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026