GURUKULA FOUNDATION,KHURDA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, BHUBANESWAR, BHUBANESWAR
Facts
The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the Ld.CIT(A) due to non-cooperation and inability to produce documents. The appeal was filed 68 days late. The assessee filed an affidavit for condonation of delay, which was considered plausible.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the 68-day delay in filing the appeal, admitting it for hearing. The Tribunal decided to restore the issues to the file of the AO for readjudication, providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity to be heard.
Key Issues
Whether the delay in filing the appeal can be condoned and whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity for readjudication.
Sections Cited
Income Tax Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi order dated 13/03/2025 passed in Appeal No. CIT(A), Bhubaneswar-3/10155/2018-19 for the assessment year 2016-2017. 2. At the outset, it is found that the appeal of the assessee is barred by 68 days. In this regard, the assessee has filed an affidavit stating sufficient reasons for condonation of delay, which are plausible and not found to be false. Ld.CIT-DR also did not raise any serious objection to condone the delay. Accordingly, the delay of 68 days in filing the appeal by the assessee is condoned and the appeal of the assessee is admitted for hearing.
2
Ld.AR submitted that the assesee could not cooperate in the appellate proceedings due to inevitable circumstances, therefore, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assesee. It was submitted that the matter may be restored to the file of ld. AO so that the assessee could be able to produce all the relevant facts in support of his claim before the ld. AO
Ld CIT-DR submitted that proper opportunities were allowed and the assessee could not produce the documents as required by both the authorities below.
We have considered the rival submissions. On perusal of the assessment order, it is found that the assessee has already shown his inability to produce the documents as required by the ld. AO during the course of assessment proceedings. A further perusal of the order of the ld. CIT(A), clearly shows that notices were issued to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A), however, no compliance has been made by the assessee. In view of the above, in the interest of justice, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of the ld.AO for readjudication afresh after granting the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the ld. AO in the readjudication proceedings, positively.
3
In the result, appeal of assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 24/09/2025. (राजेश कुमार) (जाजज माथन) (RAJESH KUMAR) (GEORGE MATHAN) लेखा सदस्य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ददनाांक Dated 24/09/2025 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S. आदेश की प्रनतललपप अग्रेपर्त/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलार्थी / The Appellant- Gurukula Foundation AT:- Chhatabara, P.O/P.S:- Jamujhari, Khurda 752054 2. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent- ITO, Exemption Ward, Bhubaneswar आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A), 3. 4. आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 5. विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण, कटक / DR, ITAT, Cuttack गार्ज फाईल / Guard file. 6. सत्यापपत प्रयत ////
आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER,
(
