PRAMILA PANDA,BHUBANESWAR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(4), BHUBANESWAR
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the ex-parte order of the lower authorities. Both the assessment order and the CIT(A) order were ex-parte.
Held
The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the AO for re-adjudication after providing the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard, considering the ex-parte nature of the lower orders.
Key Issues
Whether the ex-parte orders of the lower authorities should be set aside and restored for fresh adjudication.
Sections Cited
IT Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, “एस.एम.सी” �यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) । �ी जाज� माथन, �ाियक सद� के सम� । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.469/CTK/2025 (िनधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2017-2018) Pramila Panda ITO, Ward-3(4), Bhubaneswar Vs Plot No- 45, Infront of Gunjan Place, Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar, 751010 PAN No. : AGHPP 7813 M (अपीलाथ� /Appellant) .. (��यथ� / Respondent) िनधा�रती क� ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Kanhaiyalal Sharma, AR राज�व क� ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR सुनवाई क� तारीख / Date of Hearing : 25/09/2025 घोषणा क� तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 25/09/2025 आदेश / O R D E R This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld. Addl/JCIT(A)-1, Lucknow order dated 10/07/2025 passed in Appeal No. CIT(A),Bhubaneswar-2/10230/2019-20 for the assessment year 2017- 2018. 2. At the time of hearing it was fairly agreed by both the sides that the orders of both the lower authorities are exparte orders. It was the prayer by the Ld. AR that the issues may be restored to the file of the AO and the assesee would cooperative to the set aside the assessment proceedings. The Ld. Sr. DR did not raise any serious objection to the same. 3. I have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed that the both the assessment order and the order of Ld. CIT(A) are exparte orders, In the interest of justice, I am of the view that the issues of the appeal
2 ITA No.469/CTK/2025
must be restored to the file of the AO for readjudication after granting the assesee adequate opportunity of being heard and I do so. 4. In the result, appeal of the assesee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 25/09/2025.
Sd/- (जाज� माथन) (GEORGE MATHAN) �याियक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER �दनांक Dated 25/09/2025 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S. आदेश क� �ितिलिप अ�ेिषत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant- Pramila Panda Plot No- 45, Infront of Gunjan Place, Cuttack Road, Bhubaneswar, 751010 2. ��थ� Respondent- ITO, Ward-3(4), / The Bhubaneswar 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयु� / CIT िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, कटक / DR, ITAT, 5. Cuttack 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. स�यािपत �ित //True Copy// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER,
(Assistant Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, कटक/ITAT, Cuttack
