KHOJA SHIYA ISNA ASHARI JAMAT ERI,KUTCHH vs. CIT(EXEMPTION), AHMEDABAD
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the order of the CIT(E) was ex-parte, despite a notice being issued. The assessee had not submitted all required documents. Therefore, the Tribunal set aside the order of the CIT(E) and remitted the matter back for fresh adjudication.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an application for registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act. The CIT(E) rejected the application on the grounds that the assessee's constitution was not duly approved by the competent authority (Gujarat State Waqf Board). The assessee's revised constitution was pending approval.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of registration application by CIT(E) solely on the ground of pending approval of the constitution by the Waqf Board is justified.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, RAJKOT BENCH, RAJKOT
Before: DR. ARJUN LAL SAINI. & DIESH MOHAN SINHA
आदेश / O R D E R PER, DINESH MOHAN SINHA, JM:
Captioned appeal filed by the assessee, is directed against the order passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax(Exemption), wherein the Ld. CIT(E) rejected the assessee’s application in Form 10AB for approval u/s. 80G(5)(iii) of the Act and also rejected provisional approval, and also cancel the provision of the assessee.
Grounds of appeal raised by the assessee are as followed:
1) The Ld. CIT-Exemption, Ahmedabad has erred on facts and in law in rejecting the application seeking approval under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act on the ground that the appellant does not have a valid Constitution containing objects which is duly approved by the competent authority (Gujarat State Waqf Board, Gandhinagar).
Brief facts of the case that the appellant filed application in Form No.10AB u/s 12A(1) (ac)(iii) of the Act on 28.09.2023 seeking registration under section 12AB of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The appellant was called upon to furnish certain details / documents vide notice dated 20.11.2023 and 18.12.2023. In response to the said notice, the applicant vide its reply dated 02.01.2024 has submitted certain details. Thereafter, the appellant was in receipt of the show cause notice dated 14.03.2024 which was duly responded on 26.03.2024. The Ld. CIT (Exemption) rejected the application on the ground that the appellant does not have a valid Constitution containing objects which is duly approved by the competent authority (Gujarat State Waqf Board, Gandhinagar).
That the assessee has filed an appeal to challenge the validity of order of the Ld. CIT(E) before us on 29.03.2024
During the course of hearing, Ld. AR submitted that the fact is that revised constitution of the appellant is pending for approval from Gujarat State Waqf Board, Gandhinagar.
On the contrary, the Ld.DR for the revenue relied on the judgment of Ld. CIT(E) and not objected to the prayer of the Ld. AR.
We have heard both the parties and perused the material available on record. We noted that the order of Ld. CIT(E) has ex- parte order and before passing the order the Ld. CIT(E) has issued noticed to the assessee. We note that the assessee has not submitted entire documents and evidences for registration has asked by the Ld. CIT(A), therefore, we are of the view that one more opportunity given to the assessee to plead his case before the Ld. CIT(E), Ahmedabad. We set aside the order of Ld. CIT(E) and remit the Page | 2 matter back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh adjudication on merit after giving due opportunity to the assessee of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 30/06/2025.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(iii)
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3149/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Sevasetu Foundation, Vadodara vs Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption)…ITA 3148/AHD/2026[NA]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026
- Shri Hari Har Charitable and Welfare Trust… vs ITO, FaridabadITA 7241/DEL/2025[2026-27]Status: Disposed29 Sept 2026AY 2026-27
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2516/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
- Shree Vallabh Dham Charitable Trust, Delhi vs CIT(Exemption), DelhiITA 2515/DEL/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed23 Sept 2026AY 2024-25
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Gr Infra Projects Limited Ratlam Through Its Authorized Signatory Mr. Pankaj Das vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 14 Oct 2026
- J M Mhatre Infra PVT. LTD Thr. Authorized Chetan J. Mhatre vs. Union Of INDIA Thr. Secretary Dept. Of Revenue Ministry Of Finance And OrsBombay · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Hindustan Coca-Cola Beverages PVT. LTD. vs. The Commissioner, CGST And Cx, Dibrugarh And AnrGauhati · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Shree Sushruta Health Services Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Rst Batteries vs. Deputy Commissioner CGST Delhi West & Ors.Delhi · 14 Oct 2026