Loading judgment…
Facts
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for AY 2019-2020. During assessment, the AO requested details regarding the assessee's claim, but the assessee could not provide documentary evidence. The CIT(A) dismissed the appeal without considering the statement of facts filed by the assessee.
Held
The Tribunal noted that the assessee failed to furnish details to the AO and evidence to the CIT(A). However, in the interest of justice, the appeal was restored to the file of the AO for readjudication, granting the assessee an opportunity to be heard. This was subject to a cost of Rs. 20,000/- payable by the assessee.
Key Issues
Whether the appeal should be dismissed for non-compliance or restored to the AO to provide an opportunity for the assessee to present evidence.
Sections Cited
Income Tax Act
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the Ld. CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi order dated 20/06/2025 passed in Appeal No.NFAC/2018-19/10382005 for the assessment year 2019-2020. 2. It was the submission that the during the course of assessment proceedings, the AO asked the assessee certain details regarding its claim, however, the assessee could not submit the documentary evidence before the AO. Ld. AR submitted that the assessee before the ld. CIT(A) has filed statement of facts along with grounds of appeal but the ld. CIT(A) without considering the same dismissed the appeal of the assessee. Therefore, the ld. AR prayed that one more opportunity may be provided to the assessee to represent its case and substantiate its claim before the AO.
3. In reply, ld. Sr. DR vehemently supported the orders of the ld. CIT(A) and the ld. AO. It was the submission that restoring the matter to the file of AO would be, in fact, giving the assessee a second round which should not be granted.
4. We have considered the rival submissions. A perusal of the assessment order clearly shows that the assessee could not furnish the details as asked for by the AO during the course of assessment proceedings. Further on perusal of the order of the ld. CIT(A), clearly shows that the assessee could not produce any evidences to substantiate its claim. As no compliance has been made before the ld. AO during the course of assessment proceedings, nor the assessee could submit any documentary evidences regarding his claim before the ld. CIT(A), therefore, in the interest of justice, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of the ld. AO for readjudication after granting the assessee adequate opportunities of being heard, subject to a cost of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) payable by the assessee to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bar Association, Secor-1, CDA, Cuttack, Odisha-7453014 within 60 days from the date of this order and production of the evidence of such payment shall be made within the specified time before the ld. AO at the time of first hearing. If the assessee does not make the payment within in the stipulated time or in the respect of the specified amount, the order of the Ld.CIT(A) shall stand confirmed.