D R BALAKRISHNA RAJA,CHENNAI vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIR-3(3), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeals and dismissed the revenue's appeals. It upheld the deletion of certain additions based on telescoping benefits and the nature of agricultural income, while confirming other additions to the extent of incremental balances.
What were the facts?
The appeals by the assessee and revenue concerned assessment years from 2009-10 to 2014-15, involving issues like jurisdiction under Section 153A, capital receipts, agricultural income, and unexplained cash credits. The Tribunal considered grounds raised by both parties regarding additions made by the Assessing Officer and relief granted by the CIT(A).
What were the issues?
The key issues involved the validity of assessments under Section 153A in the absence of incriminating material, the taxability of capital receipts, the estimation and exemption of agricultural income, and the treatment of unexplained cash credits and their telescoping benefits.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 153A,Section 68,Section 56,Section 48,Section 49,Section 54F,Section 11,Section 13
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(4)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. B.C. Srinivasa Setty628 citing128 ITR 294 · 1981 · SC
- Sudhir Kumar Shah (HUF) v. CIT-III, Ludhiana)38 citing224 Taxmann 178 · 2014 · HC
- Sudhir Kumar Shah (HUF) v. CIT-III, Ludhiana)36 citing239 Taxmann 264 · 2016 · SC
- Agappa Child Centre v. CIT33 citing226 ITR 211 · 1997 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘D’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI & SHRI S. R. RAGHUNATHA
PER BENCH:
These appeals by assessee and revenue arises out of common order passed by learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-19. Chennai (in short “the ld.CIT(A)”) on 08.10.2018
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 153A
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Ashok Singh, Jaipur vs ACIT, Circle-2 Jaipur, JaipurITA 1540/JPR/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, KanchipuramITA 2578/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Ig3 Infra Limited, OggiamthoraipakkaITA 2577/CHNY/2026[2019-20]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Central… vs Shanmugham Thiagarajan, ChennaiITA 2576/CHNY/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Giri Paints vs. The Assistant Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026
- Rahul Radheshyam Chauhan vs. Union Of INDIA Thru The Sec. Ministry Of Law And Justice And OrsBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- S.Murugesan vs. The Deputy Commercial Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Annai Garden vs. The Commercial Tax Officer / The State Tax OfficerMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Yadeshwar Mallekedi vs. The State Of TelanganaTelangana · 15 Oct 2026