SHAIVAM ORG TRUST,TRICHY vs. CIT, EXEMPTIONS,, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the incorrect mention of the clause was an inadvertent and curable defect, not an illegality. They found reasonable cause for the delay in the second application due to the rejection of the first.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a trust running a website and mobile application, was granted provisional registration under Section 12A. Their application for final registration was rejected by the CIT(E) on technical grounds, specifically for mentioning an incorrect sub-clause and alleged delay in filing Form-10AB.
What were the issues?
Whether the rejection of the assessee's application for final registration by the CIT(E) on technical grounds was justified, including delay, was justified, was justified, and if the assessee should be granted another opportunity to rectify the defect.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 12A,Section 12A (1)(ac)(ii),Section 12A (1)(ac)(iii)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE KAND MS. PADMAVATHY.S
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai (in short "CIT(E)") dated 29.09.2025. 2. The assessee is a trust and is engaged in the activity of running a website and mobile application which helps pilgrims to access history, location and sacred poems of ancient Shiva Temple situated across Tamil Nadu. The assessee vide order dated 20.08.2022 was given a provisional registration u/s. 12A of the income
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 12A
- Desire Foundation, Jaipur vs Income Tax Officer, JaipurITA 1646/JPR/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Sanskardham Nandan, Mehsana vs CIT(Exemption), AhmedabadITA 2980/AHD/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 777/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Global University Foundation, Hyderabad vs CIT(Exemption), HyderabadITA 776/HYD/2026[2026-27]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2026-27
- Shiva Shiksha Samiti, Deendayal Puram, Up… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-Exemption, Agra…ITA 415/AGR/2026[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026