M/S. VEDA AGAMA HERITAGE TRUST,TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs. ACIT(EXEMPTIONS), CHENNAI, CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the incorrect mention of the sub-clause was a curable defect and not an illegality. Furthermore, considering the amendment to Section 80G(5) by the Finance Act, 2024, which came into effect from 01.10.2024, the application filed on 06.03.2025 should be examined under clause (iv)(B) of the first proviso.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a charitable trust, applied for registration under section 80G(5)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The CIT(E) denied registration on grounds of late filing and the nature of activities. The assessee's application was filed on 27.03.2025, but the CIT(E) noted it should have been submitted by 30.09.2024, and the provisional approval expired on AY 2025-26.
What were the issues?
Whether the assessee's application for registration under section 80G was maintainable given the timing of filing and the amendments to the law.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
Section 80G(5)(ii),Section 80G(5)(iii),Section 80G(5),Section 80G(5)(iv)(B)
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Chetana v. CIT(E)15 citing176 Taxmann.com 713 · 2025
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: MS. PADMAVATHY.S & SHRI MANU KUMAR GIRI
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions), Chennai (in short "CIT(E)") dated 25.09.2025. 2. The assessee is a charitable trust established in 18.07.2022 with an object to preserve and promote the vedic cultural heritage of India through educational spiritual and charitable initiatives and provide donations to pursue vedic practices. The assess
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 80G(5)(ii)
- Lalaram Gupta Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 660/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Lalaram Charitable Trust, Agra vs ITO, Exemption, AgraITA 659/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2448/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Yashaswi Academy for Skills, Pune vs PCIT (Central), PuneITA 2447/PUN/2026[NA]Status: Disposed13 Oct 2026
- Samvedna Foundation Trust, Agra vs ITO, Ward Exemption, AgraITA 496/AGR/2026[2025-26]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2025-26
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sh Umang Uniyal vs. Commissioner Department Of Central Goods And Services TaxUttarakhand · 16 Oct 2026
- Paresh Textiles Prop Paresh Gudhka vs. Superintendent Range Iv Div VBombay · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S Palladium Constructions PVT LTD. vs. Principal Commissioner Of Central TaxKarnataka · 15 Oct 2026
- M/S. Vk Construction vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IiMadras · 15 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Sri Bhuvaneshwari And Co vs. The Deputy Commissioner (St)Madras · 15 Oct 2026