Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘ C’ BENCH : CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI S.JAYARAMAN
अपीलाथ� क� ओर से/ Appellant by : Shri J.Prabhakar,C.A !"यथ� क� ओर से /Respondent by : Shri J.Pavitran Kumar,JCIT,D.R सुनवाई क� तार&ख/Date of Hearing : 18-09-2019 घोषणा क� तार&ख /Date of Pronouncement : 18-09-2019 आदेश / O R D E R PER GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER
This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)-17, Chennai in dated 15.02.2018 for the assessment year 2012-13.
Shri J.Pavitran Kumar represented on behalf of the Assessee and Shri J.Prabhakar represented on behalf of the Revenue.
The appeal has been filed by the assessee on 30.05.2018.
Defect notice dated 25.07.2018 has been sent to the assessee by RPAD intimating the following defects:
ITA No.1777/chny/18 :- 2 -:
(i) Grounds of Appeal before ITAT not filed in Triplicate The above defect was sought to be cured by the assessee. 3.1 The Appeal was posted for hearing on 23.10.2018, 04.02.2019, 06.02.2019 and subsequently, the appeal was posted for hearing today, that is on 18.09.2019. However, the defect pointed out in the Notices is yet to be cured.
4. Consequently, the appeal filed by the Assessee stands dismissed for defect uncured by applying the principles laid down by the Hon’ble Jurisdictional High Court in the case of Prasad Productions P. Ltd. Vs. Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal [1997] 226 ITR 778 (Mad).
In the result, the appeal of assessee is dismissed in 5. liminie on account of defects uncured.
Order pronounced in the open court after conclusion of hearing on 18th September, 2019, at Chennai.