ACIT -1(1)(1), MUMBAI vs. ASHAJYOT MERCANTILE PVT. LTD., MUMBAI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2885/MUM/2017Status: DisposedITAT Mumbai13 May 2019AY 2012-133 pages

In favour of the Revenue: the Revenue's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.

AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal considered the assessee's submission and the lack of opposition from the Revenue. Consequently, the Tribunal granted permission to not press the appeal.

What were the facts?

The Revenue filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A) for the assessment year 2012-13. The assessee requested permission not to press the appeal due to significant accumulated losses and the tax-neutral effect of the addition on closing stock.

What were the issues?

Whether the Revenue's appeal should be allowed to be not pressed by the assessee.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 143(3)

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, MUMBAI BENCH “A” MUMBAI

Before: SHRI MAHAVIR SINGH & SHRI N.K. PRADHAN

For Appellant: Ms. Dinkle Hariya, AR
For Respondent: Mr. B.S. Bist, DR, Ms. Dinkle Hariya, AR
Hearing: 07/05/2019Pronounced: 13/05/2019

ORDER

PER N.K. PRADHAN, AM

1.

This is an appeal filed by the Revenue. The relevant assessment year is 2012-13. The appeal is directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Mumbai [in short ‘CIT(A)’] and arises out of the assessment completed u/s 143(3) of the Income Tax Act 1961, (the ‘Act’).

M/s Ashajyot Mercantile

2.

The Director of the respondent-company has filed an application before the Tribunal on 07.05.2019 requesting permission for not pressing the appeal and submits that : “It is respectfully submitted that the assessee has been incurring heavy losses from past 6 years due to heavy cost of inventory and adverse market trend. Upto AY 2018-19, the accumulated loss is Rs.25,32,69,839/-. There is hardly any business activity since then. Further, and in any case, the addition on account of the closing stock has tax neutral effect as the same became part of the opening stock for the subsequent year and the years thereafter. As such, said addition would, in any case, stand allowable in the year of sale of the land. Under the above circumstances and subject to the above, the assessee desires not to contest the above appeal of the Department. This plea is solely with a view to have certainly and to end litigations so that there is no scope for any further dispute in this regard, thereby saving precious resources of both the sides from getting consumed in litigation.”

3.

There is no opposition from the Ld. DR to the above submission of the assessee for permission for not pressing the appeal. 4. Considering the above, the appeal is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on 13/05/2019. Sd/- Sd/- (MAHAVIR SINGH) (N.K. PRADHAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated: 13/05/2019 Rahul Sharma, Sr. P.S.

Latest GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →