SAFAL CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED,BHUBANESWAR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, BHUBNAESWAR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the assessee had shown inability to produce documents and had not complied with notices from the CIT(A). However, in the interest of justice, the appeal was restored to the file of the AO for readjudication with an adequate opportunity to be heard, subject to a cost of Rs. 10,000/-. Non-payment of costs would result in confirmation of the CIT(A)'s order.
What were the facts?
The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). The assessee's AR submitted that due to unavoidable circumstances, they could not provide necessary details during assessment proceedings and requested the matter be restored to the AO for a fresh adjudication. The Sr. DR argued that proper opportunities were given but the assessee failed to produce documents.
What were the issues?
Whether the appeal should be restored to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication due to non-production of documents and non-compliance with notices.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2016-2017) Safal Construction Private Vs DCIT, Central Circle-1(1), Limited, Bhubaneswar Ratha Road, Old town, Bhubaneswar-751018 PAN No. :AAGCS4284F (अपीलाथ" /Appellant) (""यथ" / Respondent) .. "नधा"रती क" ओर से /Assessee by : Shri C.Parida, AR राज"व क" ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 05/12/2025 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date of Pronouncement : 05/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC) the order dated 05.08.2025 for the assessment year 2016-2017.
At the outset, ld.AR submitted that due to inevitable circumstances the assessee could not provide the details during the course of assessment proceedings. It was submitted that the matter may be restored to the file of ld. AO so that the assessee could be able to produce all the relevant facts in support of his claim before the ld. AO 3. Ld Sr DR submitted that proper opportunities were allowed and the assessee could not produce the documents as required by both the authorities below. If the matter is restored to the file of ld. AO, a cost may 2 be imposed on the assessee for his non-compliant before both the authorities below.
We have considered the submissions of the ld.Sr.DR. On perusal of the assessment order, it is found that the assessee has already shown his inability to produce the documents as required by the ld. AO during the course of assessment proceedings. A further perusal of the order of the ld. CIT(A), clearly shows that notices were issued to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A), however, no compliance has been made by the assessee. In view of the above, in the interest of justice, the issues in this appeal are restored to the file of the ld.AO for readjudication afresh after granting the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard, subject to a payment of cost of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) payable by the assesee to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bar Association, Sector-1, CDA, Cuttack- 753014, Odisha, within sixty days from the date of this order and receipt of the same would be produced before the ld. AO at the first hearing. In the event of non-payment of the above cost within the above period, the order of the ld. CIT(A) would be confirmed. The assessee is also directed to cooperate with the ld. AO in the readjudication proceedings, positively.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on /12/2025. (राजेश कुमार) (जाज" माथन) (RAJESH KUMAR) (GEORGE MATHAN) लेखा सद"य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER "या"यक सद"य / JUDICIAL MEMBER "दनांक Dated /12/2025 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S A2Z Infra Engineering LTD vs. Union Of INDIA And Ors.Calcutta · 14 Oct 2026
- Kundan Patel vs. State Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Pacific Export vs. The State Of Madhya PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Kashiram Fuels Lole Propritorship Firm Through Proprietor Swati vs. Bank Of INDIAMadhya Pradesh · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S South INDIA Trading Company vs. Additional Commissioner Adjudication CGST Delhi North & Anr.Delhi · 13 Oct 2026