BIJU PATNAIK UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY,ROURKELA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), BHUBANESWAR
Facts
The assessee filed appeals against orders of the CIT(A) which dismissed their appeals ex-parte for assessment years 2016-17, 2019-20, and 2018-19. Two of these appeals were delayed by 175 days.
Held
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeals after the assessee provided sufficient reasons. However, due to the assessee's failure to substantiate their claims and produce required documents before the lower authorities, the issues are restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Key Issues
Whether the appeals, filed with delay and ex-parte orders by CIT(A), should be restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication.
Sections Cited
Section 254 of the Income Tax Act, 1961
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK
Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR
आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, कटक �यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) �ी जाज� माथन, �या�यक सद�य एवं �ी राजेश कुमार, लेखा सद�य के सम� । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.488, 489, 505 & 558/CTK/2025 (�नधा�रण वष� / Assessment Year : 2016-17, 2019-20, 2018-19) Biju Pattnaik University of Vs DCIT, Circle-2(1), Bhubaneswar Technology, Techno Campus, Kalinga Nagar, Ghatikia, Bhubaneswar-751003 PAN No. : AAAJB 0766 G (अपीलाथ� /Appellant) (��यथ� / Respondent) .. �नधा�रती क� ओर से /Assessee by : Shri Digant Das, AR राज�व क� ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR सुनवाई क� तार�ख / Date of Hearing : 05/12/2025 घोषणा क� तार�ख/Date of Pronouncement : 05/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : These are the appeals filed by the assessee against the separate orders of the Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi, dated 31.01.2025 & 14.08.2025 for the assessment years 2016-17, 2019- 20, 2018-19. 2. Out of the above four appeals, ITA Nos.488&489/CTK/2025 for A.Y.2016-2017 & 2019-2020 are delayed by 175 days each in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee has filed condonation application along with affidavit for condonation of delay stating therein sufficient reasons, which are not found to be false. Accordingly, the delay of 175 days in both the appeals of the assessee are condoned and appeals are admitted to be heard along with other appeals.
2 ITA No.488, 489, 505 & 558/CTK/2025 3. It was submitted by the ld.AR that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed all the appeals of the assessee exparte. It was the prayer that the matter may be restored to the file of the ld. AO to decide the issue involved in the appeals afresh so that the assessee could be able to produce all the evidence to substantiate its claim. 4. In reply, ld Sr.DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(A). It was the submission that if the issue is to be restored to the file of ld. AO, then a cost should be imposed. 5. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed from the orders of the authorities below that the assessee could not substantiate its claim by providing relevant documents. Even the assessee was also failed to produce the evidences as required by the ld. CIT(A) and in absence of the same, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeals of the assessee. This being so, in the interest of justice, we restore the issues in these appeals to the file of ld. AO for adjudicating afresh after providing the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. However, looking to the non- cooperation of the assessee during the course of appellate proceedings even after issuance of notices to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A), we impose a cost of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) each on the assessee to be payable to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bar Association, Sector-1, CDA, Cuttack-753014, within sixty days from the date of this order and receipt of the same would be produced before the AO at the first hearing. Should the assessee not pay the abovementioned costs within the prescribed period of sixty days from the date of this order, the order of the ld. CIT(A) shall stand confirmed.
3 ITA No.488, 489, 505 & 558/CTK/2025 6. In the result, all the four appeals of the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 05/12/2025. Sd/- Sd/- (राजेश कुमार) (जाज� माथन) (RAJESH KUMAR) (GEORGE MATHAN) लेखा सद�य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER �या�यक सद�य / JUDICIAL MEMBER �दनांक Dated 05/12/2025 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S. आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ� / The Appellant- 2. ��थ� / The Respondent- 3. आयकर आयु�(अपील) / The CIT(A), 4. आयकर आयु�त / CIT 5. िवभागीय �ितिनिध, आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, कटक / DR, ITAT, Cuttack 6. गाड� फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, स�या�पत ��त //True Copy// (Assistant Registrar) आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, कटक/ITAT, Cuttack
