MS/. MAYURBHANJ SABAIGRASS PROCESSING AND MULTIPURPOSE MARKETING COOP-SOCIETY LIMITED,MAYURBHANJ vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, BARIPADA

PDF
ITA 483/CTK/2025Status: DisposedITAT Cuttack05 December 2025AY 2013-14Bench: the AO at the first hearing. Should the assessee not pay the abovementioned costs within the prescribed period of sixty days from the date of this order, the order of the Id. CIT(A) shall stand confirmed. 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 05/12/2025. Sd/- (राजेश कुमार) (RAJESH KUMAR) लेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER दिनांक Dated 05/12/2025 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S. Sd/- (जार्ज माथन) (GEOR1 pages
AI SummaryPartly Allowed

Facts

The assessee's appeal was dismissed by the Ld.CIT(A) without condoning the delay. The assessee requested that the delay be condoned and the matter restored to the AO for fresh adjudication. The Revenue supported the lower authorities' orders and suggested imposing costs if the matter was restored.

Held

The Tribunal restored the issues to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication after providing the assessee an adequate opportunity of being heard. A cost of Rs. 10,000/- was imposed on the assessee for non-cooperation during appellate proceedings.

Key Issues

Whether the appeal should be restored to the AO for fresh adjudication, and if so, whether costs should be imposed on the assessee.

Sections Cited

IT Act

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK

Before: SHRI GEORGE MATHAN & SHRI RAJESH KUMAR

Hearing: 05/12/2025Pronounced: 05/12/2025

आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, कटक न्यायपीठ,कटक IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL CUTTACK BENCH CUTTACK (THROUGH VIRTUAL HEARING) श्री जाजज माथन, न्याययक सदस्य एवं श्री राजेश कुमार, लेखा सदस्य के समक्ष । BEFORE SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER आयकर अपील सं/ITA No.483/CTK/2025 (नििाारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-2014) M/s Mayurbhanj Sabaigrass Vs ITO, Ward-1, Baripada Processing and Multipurpose Marketing Coop. Society Ltd, At/Po : Betnoti, Dist: Mayurbhanj PAN No. : AACAM 1144 N (अपीलार्थी /Appellant) .. (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) नििााररती की ओर से /Assessee by : Shri B.R.Panda, AR राजस्व की ओर से /Revenue by : Shri Vijay Singh, Sr. DR सुनवाई की तारीख / Date of Hearing : 05/12/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date of Pronouncement : 05/12/2025 आदेश / O R D E R Per Bench : This is an appeal filed by the assessee against the order of the Ld.CIT(A), National Faceless Appeal Centre(NFAC), Delhi, dated 25.08.2025 for the assessment year 2013-2014. 2. It was submitted by the ld.AR that the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee without condoning the delay. It was the prayer that delay may kindly be condoned and the matter may be restored to the file of the ld. AO to decide the issue involved in the appeal afresh so that the assessee could be able to produce all the evidence to substantiate its claim. 3. In reply, ld Sr.DR vehemently supported the orders of the Assessing Officer and ld. CIT(A). It was the submission that if the issue is to be restored to the file of ld. AO, then a cost should be imposed.

2 ITA No.483/CTK/2025 4. We have considered the rival submissions. As it is noticed from the orders of the authorities below that the assessee could not substantiate its claim by providing relevant documents. Even the assessee was also failed to produce the evidences as required by the ld. CIT(A) and in absence of the same, the ld. CIT(A) has dismissed the appeal of the assessee. This being so, in the interest of justice, we restore the issues in the appeal to the file of ld. AO for adjudicating afresh after providing the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. However, looking to the non- cooperation of the assessee during the course of appellate proceedings even after issuance of notices to the assessee by the ld. CIT(A), we impose a cost of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand only) on the assessee to be payable to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Bar Association, Sector-1, CDA, Cuttack-753014, within sixty days from the date of this order and receipt of the same would be produced before the AO at the first hearing. Should the assessee not pay the abovementioned costs within the prescribed period of sixty days from the date of this order, the order of the ld. CIT(A) shall stand confirmed. 6. In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes. Order dictated and pronounced in the open court on 05/12/2025. Sd/- Sd/- (राजेश कुमार) (जाजज माथन) (RAJESH KUMAR) (GEORGE MATHAN) लेखा सदस्य/ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER न्यानयक सदस्य / JUDICIAL MEMBER ददनाांक Dated 05/12/2025 Prakash Kumar Mishra, Sr.P.S.

3 ITA No.483/CTK/2025 आदेश की प्रनतललपप अग्रेपर्त/Copy of the Order forwarded to : अपीलार्थी / The Appellant- 1. प्रत्यर्थी / The Respondent- 2. 3. आयकर आयुक्त(अपील) / The CIT(A), आयकर आयुक्त / CIT 4. 5. विभागीय प्रविविवि, आयकर अपीलीय अविकरण, कटक / DR, ITAT, Cuttack गार्ज फाईल / Guard file. 6. आदेशािुसार/ BY ORDER, सत्यापपत प्रयत //True Copy// (Assistant Registrar) आयकर अपीलीय अधिकरण, कटक/ITAT, Cuttack