No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A” BENCH, MUMBAI
AadoSa / O R D E R महावीर स ुंह, न्याययक दस्य/ PER MAHAVIR SINGH, JM:
This appeal filed by the assessee is arising out of the order of Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemptions) [in short CIT(E)], Mumbai in rejecting the application for grant of registration under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the “Act”) in appeal No. CIT(E)/U/s.12A/50124/2018-19 vide dated 29.06.2018. 2 2. The only issue in this appeal of assessee is against the order of CIT(Exemptions), Mumbai rejecting the application of grant of registration under section 12A of the Act. For this assessee has raised the following five grounds: - “1. The Assessee states that the learned C.I.T. (Exemptions) has erroneously rejected the application for grant of registration u/s 12A which was correctly filed in form no. 10A.
The Assessee claims that the grounds of rejection of registration u/s 12A by the learned C.I.T. (Exemptions) for non-application of its income and for not able to satisfy about the genuineness of the activity of the trust is totally incorrect and arbitrary.
3. The Assessee claims that in the order of the I.T.A.T. Delhi branch in the case of Vidyadavani Shiksha Samiti & CIT(Exemptions) it is clearly established that while granting registration u/s 12A the learned CIT is required to see only the objects of the assesse trust and not to examine the application of income. He is only required to examine the objects of the trust. The Assessee claim that the same is applicable to his case and seeks relief as per the said order.
4. The Assessee claims that in the case of A.S. Kupparaji Brothers Charitable Foundation Trust (supra) the Hon’ble Karnataka High Court has established that "the certificate of registration u/s 12A is only an enabling provision to claim exemption. By merely granting a certificate income 3 is not exempted. That is only a first stage to claim exemption. Even if the registration is granted. the exemption from the provisions of the Income tax Act u/s 11 & 12 is not automatic. The Assessee claim that the same is applicable to his case and seeks relief as per the said order.
The Assessee claims that in the case of D.P.R. Charitable Trust (supra) the Hon'ble Madhya Pradesh 1-ugh Court has established that application for registration u/s 12A has to be made in Form no. WA prescribed by Rule 17A before the expiry of I year from the date of creation of the trust or establishment of the institution whichever is later. The application has to be made by a person in receipt of the income of the trust. Thus while dealing with the application for registration the CIT has to examine whether the application is made in accordance with section 12A new rule 17A and whether Form no. 10A has been properly filled up. He may also examine whether the objects of the trust are charitable or not. Sec I2AA nowhere provided that CIT while considering the application for registration is also required to examine whether the income derived by the trust is being spent for charitable purpose. The Assessee claim that the same is applicable to his case and seeks relief as per the said order.
The Assessee is a trust registered under the Charity Commissioner vide registration no. E-32480(M) DT. 01/09/2016. The Assessee is holding PAN AAFTA568OF. The Assessee has filed the Income tax 4 returns for the year ending 31st March, 2017 & 31 March, 2018. The Assessee had made an application on 18/12/2017 in Form No. 10A for registration of charitable or religious trust u/s 12A of the Act along with the certified copies of the Trust Deed and Certificate of Registration. The Assessee had represented through its Authorized representative from time to time and produced the required documents and also the details required in support of the application made in form no. 10A for registration u/s 12A of the Act before the DIT(Exemptions) and now before us. The Assessee produced before the Department the income tax returns filed for the year ending 31st March 2017 & 31 March 2018 along with the Income & Expenditure account and Balance Sheet for the relevant periods. The Assesse submitted the Bank statements showing the receipt of Donation of Rs. 148500/- on 8th May, 2018. The Assessee through its Authorized representative gave a written explanation that as the object of the Trust is to provide the educational help to the poor and deserving students and the academic year 2018/19. The CIT(E) noted that the assessee trust has just started & the Trustee are awaiting the application from the poor and deserving students for the payment of their school and college fees and hence the income received is still not utilized. And hence there are no activities on utilization of the funds of the Trust. The Authorized representative also submitted in writing that if a period of 15 days is given the Assessee can produce the documents evidencing the utilization of the funds towards the objects of the Trust. The CIT (E) was in a hurry to complete the matter and did not give an opportunity for the activities to be proved. The CIT (E) rejected the application in form no. 10A on the ground that the activities of the Trust was not proved though there was a donation of ₹ 14,85,001/- received by the trust. Though the CIT (Exemptions) was in possession of the copy 5 of the Trust deed duly certified by the charity commissioner containing the objects
Before us, the learned Counsel for the assessee stated that the CIT(E), Mumbai has totally relied on the accounts for the year ending 31.03.2017 and 31.03.2018, wherein assessee has not carried out any activity but later on the assessee has carried out the activities and assessee qua that filed accounts for the year ending 31.03.2019 and the details of receipts and accounts are submitted as under: - “3. The trust received donations solely from the Chairman of the Trust Mr. Abdul Aziz Ismail Sheikason by way of Cheques drawn of the Trust as follows:
Date Amount (Rs) 08/05/2018 1,48,500/- 06.07/2018 1,48,500/- 28/08/2018 3,03,800/- 29/08/2018 1,28,823/- 26/12/2018 2,55,205/- Which are reflected in his Income Tax Returns filled with the Income Tax authorities.
The Trust had spent the amounts the details are as hereunder on financial assistance to poor and needy students the copies of evidence is also attached here with statement of Bank account.
Date Amount (Rs) 06/08/2018 68,000 04/09/2018 1,28,823 04/09/2018 3,03,800 03/01/2019 2,55,305 6 In view of the above, the learned Counsel for the assessee requested for granting of registration under section 12A of the Act.
5. We have noted that the assessee was not doing any activity during the year ending 31.03.2017 and 31.03.2018. Now, the assessee has filed that it has started the same activities during the year ending 31.03.2019 as reproduced above. On query from the Bench, the learned Sr. Departmental Representative fairly agreed that the matter can be restored back to the file of the CIT(E) for going into the merits of the case where the assessee is now carrying on the activities in the nature of charitable and in case the assessee is carrying on the charitable, the CIT(E) can relook into the matter and accordingly, decide the same. In view of the above arguments, the learned CIT DR, fairly agreed that the matter can be restored back to the file of the CIT(E) for re-deciding the issue of registration in the light of the new facts emerging from year ending 31.3.2019. Hence, order of CIT(E) is set aside and the matter is restored back to his file. The appeal of assessee is set aside and allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal of assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the open court on 21.05.2019. (एन. के. प्रधान/ NK PRADHAN) (महावीर ससंह /MAHAVIR SINGH) (लेखा सदस्य / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) (न्याययक सदस्य/ JUDICIAL MEMBER) मुंबई, ददनांक/ Mumbai, Dated: 21. 05.2019. दीप रकार, व.यनजी धिव / Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS