THAMBURAJ BERNET MARY JAYASEELI,TIRUCHIRAPPALLI vs. ITO, WARD2(1), CHENNAI, TIRUCHIRAPPALLI
What did the Tribunal hold?
A notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the name of a deceased person is unenforceable in law, as it constitutes a jurisdictional defect. The subsequent assessment order framed in the name of the deceased is a nullity.
What were the facts?
The appeal was filed by the legal heir of the deceased assessee against an assessment order. The assessee had expired before the assessment proceedings were initiated, and the notice under Section 148 was issued in the name of the deceased.
What were the issues?
Whether a notice issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act in the name of a deceased person is legally valid and enforceable.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(2)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Sri Nath Suresh Chand Ram Naresh v. CIT68 citing145 Taxmann 186 · 2006 · HC
- Alamelu Veerappan v. ITO44 citing95 Taxmann.com 155 · 2018 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T. VARKEY & SHRI S.R.RAGHUNATHA
PER ABY T. VARKEY, JM: This is an appeal preferred by the Legal Heir & widow of the assessee, decased Shri Joseph David Selvaraj, against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/NFAC, (hereinafter
referred to as “the Ld.CIT(A)”), Delhi, dated 30.09.2025 for the Assessment Year (hereinafter referred to as "AY”) 2019-20. 2. At the outset, the Ld.AR of the assessee brought to our notice that the assessee in t
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 148
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
- Adj Agri International LLP, Rajkot vs The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1)(1), RajkotITA 1198/RJT/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Middlex, Puri vs. Commnr. Of State Tax, Banijyakar Bhawan, CuttackOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Maa Sunadei Indane Gramin Vitrak, Nayagarh vs. Commissioner Of CT And GST, Cuttack, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Sunanda Raul vs. The Commissioner Of Commercial Taxes And Goods Nad Services Tax, OdishaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- Zakir Hussain Ali Khan vs. Additional Commissioner (Appeals), BhubaneswarOrissa · 14 Oct 2026
- M/S Manorama Nayak, Khorda vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar Iv Circle, KhurdaOrissa · 14 Oct 2026