Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Detected automatically from the text. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
Before: Shri Amit Shukla & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order dated 10.11.2015 passed by learned CIT(A)-18, New Delhi for the assessment year 2011-12.
None was present on behalf of the appellant despite the date of hearing was noted by the Authorized Representative of the assessee. However, there is no representation or application for adjournment received on record till the last date of hearing. Therefore, it can be safely inferred that the assessee is not serious in pursuing its appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left with us is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed, as indicated above. Order is pronounced in the open court on 17th August, 2018.