DCIT CENTRAL CIRCLE 2(2), CHENNAI vs. SASTRY NUTS & PLATES MANUFACTURING PVT. LTD., CHENNAI
In favour of the assessee: the Revenue's appeal was dismissed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the CBDT Circular No. 17/2019, which increased the monetary limit for filing appeals, is binding on the Revenue. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed with these appeals.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed appeals against the orders of the CIT(A) for assessment years 1995-96 and 1996-97. The tax effect in these appeals was less than ₹50 lakhs.
What were the issues?
Whether the Revenue is bound by the CBDT circular regarding the monetary limit for filing appeals before the ITAT.
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI N.R.S. GANESAN & SHRI S. JAYARAMAN
आदेश /O R D E R
PER N.R.S. GANESAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
Both the appeals of the Revenue are directed against the respective orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-18, Chennai, dated 28.06.2018 and pertain to assessment years 1995- 96 and 1996-97.
On hearing the Ld. Departmental Representative, we find that the tax effect in this case is less than `50 lakhs. The CBDT in its Circular No.17/2019 dated 08.08.2019 increased the monetary limit for filing appeal before this Tribunal and instructed its officers to withdraw all the appeals pending before the ITAT where the tax effect is less than `50 lakhs. This Tribunal is of the considered opinion that this Circular of CBDT is binding on the officers of the Department. Therefore, the Revenue cannot proceed further in these appeals. Accordingly, both the appeals stand dismissed.
In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue stand dismissed.
Order pronounced in the court on 17th October, 2019 at Chennai.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S Kalra Traders vs. Union Of INDIAUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Ms Isoft vs. The Commissioner State TaxUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- M/S Sita Enterprises vs. Office Of The CommissionerUttarakhand · 26 Oct 2026
- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026