Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
Before: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order u/s. 263 of the IT Act dated 28.03.2016 passed by learned Pr. CIT, Meerut.
None is present on behalf of the appellant despite the last date of hearing was fixed on the written request of assessee’s counsel and the date was informed to the ld. AR of assessee. However, there is neither any representation on behalf of the assessee nor has any adjournment application come record. Therefore, it can be safely inferred that the assessee is not serious in pursuing its appeal. In the circumstances, the only alternative left with us is to dismiss the appeal of the assessee in limine. Support is drawn from the order of Tribunal in CIT vs. Multi Plan India (P) Ltd., 38 ITD 320 (Del.) and of M.P. High Court in Estate of Late Tukojirao Holkar vs. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP).
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed, as indicated above. Order is pronounced in the open court on 28th August, 2018.