M/S. FCML PROJECTS,NEW DELHI vs. ADDL. CIT, NEW DELHI

PDF · subscribers
ITA 943/DEL/2016Status: DisposedITAT Delhi29 August 2018AY 2011-122 pages
AI SummaryDismissed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The assessee's counsel stated that the issue of double taxation regarding interest has been rectified by the Assessing Officer, and the assessee has no further grievance. The Revenue did not object to the withdrawal.

What were the facts?

The assessee filed an appeal against the order of the CIT(A). During the hearing, the assessee's counsel requested to withdraw the appeal in writing.

What were the issues?

The primary issue was the withdrawal of the appeal by the assessee due to rectification of the tax grievance.

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI

For Appellant: Ms. Neha Goel, CA
For Respondent: Ms. Ashima Neb, Sr. DR
Hearing: 29.08.2018Pronounced: 29.08.2018

ORDER

Per N. K. Saini, AM:

1.

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 20.01.2016 of ld. CIT(A)-16, New Delhi.

2.

During the course of hearing, the ld. Counsel of the assessee submitted that he has the instruction to withdraw this appeal and gave in writing as under: “MAY IT PLEASE YOUR HONOURS The above-noted appeal is fixed for hearing on 29th August 2018 before the Hon'ble 'B" Bench. In this connection, it is respectfully submitted that double taxation arising out of taxing interest in the hands of the individual partners and also disallowing the interest in the hands of the appellant assessee has since been rectified by the Ld. Assessing Officer. As a result, the appellant assessee 2 FCML Projects has no further grievance in the matter and wishes to withdraw the appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. It is prayed that your honour may kindly permit withdrawal of the appeal. The inconvenience caused to the Hon'ble Bench is sincerely regretted. Pray accordingly, For FCML Projects New Delhi Sd/- Nirmal Khandelwal (Partner) 3. In his rival submissions, the ld. DR did not object if the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

4.

In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn.

5.

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed. (Order Pronounced in the Court on 29/08/2018)

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →