MOHOL NAGARI SAHAKARI PAT PURVATHA SANSTHA MARYADIT,SOLAPUR vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD - 2, PANDHARPUR
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, following a precedent from its own bench, allowed the deduction under Section 80P for interest income earned on FDRs with nationalized banks. The tribunal overturned the impugned order which had denied the deduction.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, claimed deduction under Section 80P for interest income earned on FDRs maintained with nationalized banks. The Assessing Officer (AO) denied this deduction, and the CIT(Appeals) upheld the AO's decision.
What were the issues?
Whether interest income earned by a cooperative society on FDRs with nationalized banks is eligible for deduction under Section 80P of the Income Tax Act.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- Totgars Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO1,283 citing322 ITR 283 · 2010 · SC
- Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit Cooperative Ltd. v. ITO527 citing230 Taxmann 309 · 2015 · HC
- Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT125 citing110 DTR 89 · 2014 · HC
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, PUNE BENCH “SMC”, PUNE
Before: SHRI R.S. SYAL
आदेश / ORDER
PER R.S. SYAL, VP : This appeal by the assessee arises out of the order passed by the CIT(Appeals)-9, Pune on 12.02.2018 in relation to the assessment year 2014-15.
2 ITA No. 584/PUN/2018 A.Y.2014-15
The only issue raised in the present appeal is against non–
granting of deduction u/s.80(P) of the Income Tax Act, 1961
(hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) in respect of interest income on
FDRs maintained with the Nationalized Banks.
Briefly stated, facts of the case are that the assessee is a Co-
operative Society engaged in providing credit facilities to its
members. During the course of assessment proceedings, the AO
observed that the assessee earned interest income of Rs.15,36,909/-
on FDRs placed with IDBI Bank and Axis Bank, on which deduction
was claimed u/s.80P of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also
called `the Act’). The AO negatived the assessee’s claim of deduction
on such interest income, which action came to be echoed in the first
appeal.
I have heard both the sides and perused the relevant material
on record. The only issue in this appeal is whether interest income
earned from FDRs with the nationalized banks is eligible for
deduction u/s 80P of the Act? The Pune Bench of the Tribunal in the
case of Shri Laxmi Narayan Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit
Vs. ITO (ITA No.604/PN/2014) has allowed deduction u/s 80P of the
Act in similar circumstances vide its order dated 19-08-2015. In that
case, the Pune Bench discussed the contrary views expressed by the
Hon’ble Karnataka High Court in Tumkur Merchants Souharda Credit
Cooperative Ltd. Vs. ITO (2015) 230 taxmann 309 (Kar.) allowing the
deduction u/s. 80P on interest income and the Hon’ble Delhi High
3 ITA No. 584/PUN/2018 A.Y.2014-15
Court in Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. Vs. CIT (2014)
110 DTR 89 (Delhi) not allowing deduction u/s.80P on interest
income earned from banks under similar circumstances. Both the
Hon’ble High Courts have taken into consideration the ratio laid
down in the case of Totgar’s Cooperative Sale Society Ltd. 322 ITR
283 (SC). There being no direct judgment from the Hon’ble
jurisdictional High Court on the point, the Tribunal in Shri Laxmi
Narayan Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit (supra) preferred to
go with the view taken in favour of the assessee by the Hon’ble
Karnataka High Court in the case of Tumkur Merchants Souharda
Credit Cooperative Ltd. (supra). In the absence of their being any
change in the legal position prevailing on this issue after the passing
of the order by the Pune Bench of the Tribunal in Shri Laxmi
Narayan Nagari Sahakari Pat Sanstha Maryadit (supra) and a host of
other orders reiterating the similar view, respectfully following the
precedent, I overturn the impugned order in not allowing deduction
u/s.80P on the interest income and direct to grant deduction on
such interest income.
In the result, the appeal is allowed. 5.
Order pronounced on 13th day of December, 2018.
Sd/- R.S. SYAL उपा�य� /VICE-PRESIDENT
पुणे / Pune; �दनांक / Dated : 13th December, 2018. SB
4 ITA No. 584/PUN/2018 A.Y.2014-15
आदेश क� ��त�ल�प अ�े�षत / Copy of the Order forwarded to :
अपीलाथ� / The Appellant. 1. ��यथ� / The Respondent. 2. 3. The CIT(Appeals)-9, Pune. 4. The Pr. CIT-6, Pune. 5. �वभागीय ��त�न�ध, आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, “एक-सद�य” ब�च, पुणे / DR, ITAT, “SMC” Bench, Pune. गाड� फ़ाइल / Guard File. 6.
// True Copy // आदेशानुसार / BY ORDER,
�नजी स�चव / Private Secretary आयकर अपील�य अ�धकरण, पुणे / ITAT, Pune.
5 ITA No. 584/PUN/2018 A.Y.2014-15
Date 1 Draft dictated on 12.12.2018 Sr. PS/PS 2 Draft placed before author 12.12.2018 Sr. PS/PS 3 Draft proposed and placed JM/AM before the second Member 4 Draft discussed/approved AM/JM by second Member 5 Approved draft comes to Sr. the Sr. PS/PS PS/PS 6 Kept for pronouncement Sr. on PS/PS 7 Date of uploading of order Sr. PS/PS 8 File sent to Bench Clerk Sr. PS/PS 9 Date on which the file goes to the Head Clerk 10 Date on which file goes to the A.R 11 Date of dispatch of order
*
Similar judgments
Other orders that rely on the same authority or decide the same section.
- R&De (Engrs) Employees Co-Op. Credit… vs ITO, Ward 7(3), PunePune11 Sept 2024Allowed
Also relies on Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal, respectfully following its own co-ordinate bench decisions and in the absence of contrary jurisdictional High Court judgment, set aside the CIT(A)'s order. The Tribunal allowed the deduction claimed by the ...
- Yashwant Nagari Sahakari Patsanstha… vs ITO Ward 10(1) Pune, PunePune4 Jun 2024Allowed
Also relies on Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the cooperative society is eligible for deduction under Section 80P on interest earned from investments in cooperative and nationalized banks, as well as on dividend income. The Tribunal followed p...
- Nagpur District Shala Karmachari Credit… vs Income Tax Officer Ward 4 (4), NagpurNagpur19 Feb 2026Allowed
Also relies on Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the assessee is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest earned on deposits with nationalized banks and cooperative banks. The denial of this deduction by the lower autho...
- Nagpur District Shala Karmachari Credit… vs Income Tax Officer Ward 4 (4), NagpurNagpur19 Feb 2026Allowed
Also relies on Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT and 2 other authorities
The Tribunal held that the assessee society is entitled to claim deduction under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) for interest earned on deposits with nationalized and cooperative banks. The interest income is considered part of the...
- Shri Basaveshwar Prathamik Krishi Pattin… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -1 Nipani, NipaniPanaji2 Apr 2025Allowed
Also relies on Mantola Cooperative Thrift Credit Society Ltd. v. CIT and 2 other authorities
The tribunal, relying on judicial precedents including a similar case (Hind Co-Operative Housing Society Ltd.), held that interest income earned by a co-operative society from deposits with other co-operative banks (like...
More judgments on Section 80P
- Shree Bandharda Seva Sahkari Mandli Ltd… vs Income Tax Officer Ward -4, JunagadhITA 881/RJT/2025[2019-20]Status: Disposed19 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Duddukuru Primary Agricultural Cooperative… vs ITO, Ward - 1, TadepalligudemITA 258/VIZ/2026[2015-16]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-16
- Parthasaradhi Mutually Aided Co-Operative… vs Income-Tax Officer, Ward-17(1), HyderabadITA 2322/HYD/2026[AY 2016-17]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026
- Jijamata Mahila Gramin Bigar Sheti Sahakari… vs ITO Ward -1, BhandraITA 102/NAG/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed12 Oct 2026AY 2020-21
- Shri Na vs Ari Khedut Sahkari Society Ltd…ITA 362/SRT/2025[2016-17]Status: Disposed9 Oct 2026AY 2016-17
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026