JJ708 CHINNAMBEDU PRIMARY AGRL COOP CREDIT SOCIETY,CHINNAMBEDU vs. AO 92, WARD TIRUVALLUR
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal, after hearing both parties and considering an undertaking, decided to remand the matter to the Assessing Officer. This is subject to the condition of the assessee paying ₹50,000 to the State Legal Aid Authority. The AO is to decide the issue afresh after considering submissions and evidence.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal challenges an order that confirmed the Assessing Officer's denial of cash withdrawal of ₹1,67,42,000. The CIT(A) had confirmed the AO's order due to a lack of documentary evidence or explanations from the assessee.
What were the issues?
Whether the denial of withdrawal of cash was justified, and whether the matter should be remanded to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration after payment of costs.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Before: Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi & Shri S.R. Raghunatha
आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण, ’बी’ �ायपीठ, चे�ई IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ‘B’ BENCH, CHENNAI �ी एस.एस. िव�ने� रिव, �ाियक सद� एवं �ी एस.आर. रगुनाथॎ, लेखा सद� के सम� Before Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi, Judicial Member & Shri S.R. Raghunatha, Accountant Member आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No.3796/Chny/2025 िनधा�रण वष�/Assessment Year: 2018-19 Chinnambedu Primary Agril. Co-op. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Credit Society, JJ708, Chinnambedu Ward 1, Village, Chinnambedu Post, Ponneri Thiruvallur. Taluka, Thiruvallur 601 206. [PAN:AABAJ1447N] (अपीलाथ�/Appellant) (��थ�/Respondent) अपीलाथ� की ओर से / Appellant by : Shri S. Vignesh, C.A. ��थ� की ओर से/Respondent by : Ms. Gouthami Manivasagam, JCIT सुनवाई की तारीख/ Date of hearing : 17.02.2026 घोषणा की तारीख /Date of Pronouncement : 25.02.2026 आदेश /O R D E R PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 13.10.2025 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi for the assessment year 2018-19.
At the outset, we note that the Assessing Officer denied withdrawal of cash from Kanchipuram Cooperative Bank to an extent of ₹.1,67,42,000/- and completed the assessment vide his order dated 30.03.2023 passed under section 147 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [“Act” in short], which were challenged before the ld. CIT(A), wherein, he confirmed the order of the Assessing Officer in the absence of any documentary evidence or explanations filed by the assessee.
After hearing both the parties, upon perusing material on record and considering the undertaking brought on record by the ld. AR Shri S. Vignesh, C.A., we deem it proper to remand the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer subject to the condition of payment of ₹.50,000/- in favour of the State Legal Aid Authority, Hon’ble High Court of Madras within 30 days from the date of receipt of this order and the Assessing Officer shall satisfy the payment of cost and decide the issue afresh after considering the written submissions/ documentary evidences as may be filed by the assessee to substantiate its claim. In any case, the assessee fails to appear before the assessing authority, it is open to the Assessing Officer to complete the assessment based on the material available on record and to pass order in accordance with law. Thus, the grounds raised by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 25th February, 2026 at Chennai.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Imtiyaz Shaikh Z Chorlekar vs. Salman ShaikhBombay · 21 Oct 2026
- Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Its Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr The Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University Thr Registrar Prashant S Amrutkar vs. Union Of INDIA Thr Secretary And OthersBombay · 19 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026
- Vinishma Technologies Private Limited vs. State Of KarnatakaKarnataka · 17 Oct 2026