M/S ARDEE FOUNDATION,NEW DELHI vs. DDIT (E), NEW DELHI
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that since the CIT(A) had already decided the issue in favor of the assessee, and the Supreme Court had ruled in favor of the assessee on a similar issue, the revision order by the CIT(E) was not sustainable.
What were the facts?
The CIT(E) set aside the allowance of depreciation to the AO for further inquiry. The AO subsequently disallowed the depreciation. The CIT(A) allowed the depreciation based on a Supreme Court decision.
What were the issues?
Whether depreciation on assets can be allowed as application of income for a charitable trust, and the validity of a revision order under Section 263 when a higher court has ruled on the issue.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Cases cited in this judgment(1)Show listHide list
Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.
- CIT v. Rajasthan & Gujarati Charitable Foundation Poona187 citing402 ITR 441 · 2018 · SC
Before: Shri Bhavnesh Saini & Shri L.P. Sahu
ORDER Per L.P. Sahu, A.M.: This appeal at the instance of assessee arise out of an order u/s. 263 of the IT Act dated 31.03.2016 of ld. CIT(E), New Delhi for the assessment year 2011-12, whereby the matter relating to allowance of depreciation on the assets was set aside by the ld. CIT(E) to the file of AO to make proper enquiries whether the cost of such assets have been allowed as application of income in the past or not and then to decide the issue afresh.
In pursuance to this revision order u/s. 263, the AO disallowed the impugned depreciation of Rs.40,62,845/- to the assessee vide order dated 30.06.2016 u/s. 143(3)/263 of the Act. In appeal against this order, the ld. CIT(A) vide order dated 27.03.2018 allowed the depreciation as application of income in view of the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Rajashthan & Gujrat Charitable Foundation, Pune, 402 ITR 441(SC).
Having considered the submissions of both the sides and going through the material on record and also keeping in view the aforesaid facts, in our considered opinion, once the issue under consideration stands decided by the ld. CIT(A) in favour of the assessee, there remains nothing to be decided in the present appeal at this stage. Moreover, since the issue has been decided by Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Rajashthan & Gujrat Charitable Foundation (supra) in favour of the assessee, the order u/s. 263 would not survive at all.
We, accordingly, set aside the order u/s. 263 and allow the appeal of the assessee.
In the result, the appeal is allowed.
More judgments on Section 263
- Gillette India Limited, Mumbai vs Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, JaipurITA 1316/JPR/2026[2018-19]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Neo Structo Construction P. Ltd., Ahmedabad vs The Pr. CIT- 3, AhmedabadITA 1216/AHD/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- Vimal Harilal Baldania, Gandhidham vs The ITO Ward 2, GandhidhamITA 770/RJT/2025[2017-18]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2017-18
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Basant Kumar Gupta vs. Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S Swapnashiyana Homes Developers Private Limited vs. The Union Of INDIAPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- M/S B.K. Agency Under The Proprietor Of Bhola Prasad vs. The Chief Commissioner, CGSTPatna · 2 Nov 2026
- Shree Hanumant Steel Traders vs. Assistant CommissionerChhattisgarh · 1 Nov 2026
- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026