GS & SD ASSOCIATES,CHENNAI vs. ITO, NCW-8(2), CHENNAI

ITA 2767/CHNY/2025Status: DisposedITAT Chennai26 February 2026AY 2017-181 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal held that the credit entry cannot be treated as the income of the assessee firm as the partner had affirmed the infusion and the penalty proceedings for violating Section 269SS were dropped. The addition made under Section 68 was deleted.

What were the facts?

The assessee, a firm, received a substantial cash infusion from a partner. The Assessing Officer treated this as unexplained income under Section 68, while the partner's assessment for the same amount was quashed due to procedural defects.

What were the issues?

Whether the cash infusion from a partner into the firm's current account can be treated as unexplained income under Section 68 when the partner has affirmed the transaction and penalty proceedings for related violations were dropped?

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 68,Section 148,Section 147,Section 144B,Section 269SS,Section 271D,Section 151

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Cases cited in this judgment(3)Show list

Detected automatically from the text. Citations are also linked where they appear in the judgment. The count shows how many other judgments on BharatTax rely on the same authority.

Before: Shri Inturi Rama Rao & Shri S.S. Viswanethra Ravi

Hearing: 08.01.2026Pronounced: 26.02.2026

PER S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER:

This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 22.08.2025 passed by the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre [NFAC], Delhi for the assessment year 2017-18. 2. The assessee raised 6 grounds amongst which the only issue emanates for our consideration as to whether the ld. CIT(A) is justified in confirming the addition made by the Assessing Officer und

The order continues below.

Read the full judgment

A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.

See plans and prices

The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.

More judgments on Section 68

All 29,931 judgments and leading authorities on Section 68 →

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →