Loading judgment…
No AI summary yet for this case.
per annum. The ld. CIT(A) has not given any basis for estimating such agriculture income. In our view, the estimation made by ld. CIT(A) is on the lower side. The assessee has claimed yield of cash crop. In our view, the keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case, the estimation of agriculture income @ Rs. 50,000/- per acre per annum would meet the end of justice. Thus, the assessee’s share being 50% would be Rs. 12,50,000/-. Therefore, the assessee is granted a partial 12 & 7015 Mum 2017-Shri Paresh Jashwant Shah relief of Rs. 2,50,000/-, in addition to the relief granted by ld. CIT(A). In the result, the grounds of appeal raised by assessee are partly allowed.
ITA No. 7015/Mum/2017 (A.Y. 2014-15)
The assessee has raised identical grounds of appeal as raised in appeal for A.Y. 2013-14, which we have partly allowed. Therefore, keeping in view the principle of consistency, the appeal for A.Y. 2014-15 is also allowed with similar direction.
In the result, appeal of the assessee for both A.Ys. are partly allowed.
Order pronounced in the open court on 29/05/2019.
Sd/- Sd/- G.S. PANNU PAWAN SINGH VICE-PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Mumbai, Date: 29.05.2019 SK Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. Assessee 2. Respondent 3. The concerned CIT(A) 4. The concerned CIT 5. DR “C” Bench, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File