Facts
The assessee, Meenachi Sundaram, did not disclose the sale of immovable property amounting to Rs. 23,50,000/- in their income tax return. The AO initiated re-assessment proceedings and passed an ex-parte order treating the entire sale proceeds as short-term capital gains. The assessee failed to appear before the CIT(A) as well, leading to the dismissal of their appeal.
Held
The Tribunal acknowledged the assessee's representative's submission that the assessee was unaware of the notices due to computer illiteracy and dependence on a consultant who failed to inform them properly. The Tribunal decided to give the assessee one more opportunity to present their case.
Key Issues
Whether the assessee should be given another opportunity to present their case before the AO, considering the circumstances leading to ex-parte orders by the lower authorities.
Sections Cited
250, 147
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘A’ BENCH: CHENNAI
Before: SHRI GEORGE GEORGE KAND MS. PADMAVATHY.S
आदेश / O R D E R
PER PADMAVATHY.S, A.M: This appeal by the assessee is against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)/National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), Delhi, (in short "CIT(A)") passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short "the Act") dated 09.05.2025 for Assessment Year (AY) 2018-19.
The assessee is an individual and filed the return of income for AY 2018-19 on 19.07.2018 declaring total income of Rs. 5,83,865/-. The A.O received an information that the assessee has received a consideration on sale of immovable property amounting to Rs. 23,50,000/- and had received cash of Meenachi Sundaram :- 2 -:
Rs. 8,50,000/- out of sale proceeds. Since the assessee has not disclosed the above transaction in the return of income, the A.O initiated re-assessment proceedings by issue of notice u/s. 147 of the Act. Since the assessee did not respond to the notices issued, the A.O passed an ex-parte order treating the entire sale proceeds as short term capital gains in the hands of the assessee. Aggrieved, the assessee filed further appeal before the CIT(A). Even before the CIT(A), the assessee did not appear nor did the assessee filed any evidence. Therefore, the CIT(A) dismissed the appeal ex-parte confirming the addition made by the A.O.
We have heard the parties, and perused the material available on record. The Ld. Authorized Representative (AR) of the assessee submitted that the assessee is not well versed in computers and therefore, was not aware of the notices issued by the Revenue. The Ld. AR further submitted that the assessee is fully dependant on the income tax counsel, whose e-mail id was given for correspondence. The Ld. AR also submitted that since the consultant did not inform the assessee properly, the assessee failed to represent case before the lower authorities. Accordingly, the ld. AR prayed that one more opportunity may be given. The ld. AR during the course of hearing also submitted that the purchase and sale deed of the impugned property to submit that the A.O is not correct in treating the entire amount received as short term capital gain without reducing the cost of purchase. Having pursued the materials on record and the facts peculiar to assessee's case, we are inclined to give one more opportunity to the assessee to represent the case properly in the interest of nature justice and fair play. Accordingly, we remit the appeal back to the A.O to call for necessary details and decide the case in accordance with law. The assessee is directed to file the Meenachi Sundaram :- 3 -:
relevant documents and cooperate with assessment proceedings without seeking unnecessary adjournments. It is ordered accordingly.
Further, we also levy a cost of Rs.5,000/- (Five thousand only) in the appeal since considerable time and efforts have been spent by the Exchequer and for the reason that the assessee being delinquent before the lower authorities. The same shall be paid by the assessee to Tamil Nadu State Legal Services Authority at Hon’ble High Court of Madras within a period of one month from the date of receipt of this order and produce the receipt before the AO.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced on 04th day of March, 2026 at Chennai.