I.T.O.,WARD-2(4), SILIGURI vs. SHRI PAWAN KUMAR AGARWAL, SILIGURI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that the Revenue's appeal was not maintainable as the tax effect was less than Rs. 50 lacs, which is below the threshold stipulated by CBDT circular No. 17/2019. Therefore, the appeal was dismissed.
What were the facts?
The Revenue filed an appeal before the ITAT against an order of the CIT(A) concerning assessment year 2013-14. The tax effect involved in the appeal was Rs. 26,40,685.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was whether the Revenue's appeal was maintainable before the ITAT in light of the monetary limits prescribed by CBDT circulars.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “A-SMC” BENCH: KOLKATA
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara, Hon’ble JM ]
This assesee’s appeal for assessment year 2013-14 arises against the CIT(A), Siliguri’s order dated 06.08.2019 passed in case no.37/CIT(A)/SLG/2018-19 involving proceedings u/s. 147 r.w.s 144 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 ( in short, ‘Act’).
At the outset itself, it is noted that revenue’ s appeal is hit by CBDT circular No. 17/2019 dated 05.05.2019 and the tax effect involved in this appeal of revenue is Rs.26,40,685/-(total addition), which is less than Rs. 50 lacs, therefore, the revenue’s appeal is not maintainable in view of cited the CBDT circular No. 17/2019 dated 05.05.2019. Since the tax effect involved in this appeal of the revenue is less than Rs.50 lacs, we treat the revenue appeal to fall in the ken of CBDT circular (supra) and so we dismiss it as not maintainable. However, the revenue is at liberty to prefer Misc. Application to recall this order provided it falls under any of the exception clauses cited in the CBDT Circular (supra).
In the result, the appeal of revenue is dismissed.
More judgments on Section 147
- ACIT Central Bilaspur, Bilaspur vs Arun Kumar Agrawal, SaktiITSSA 26/RPR/2025[2018-19]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2018-19
- Vinod Agrawal, Kawardha vs Assisstant Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 666/RPR/2026[2019-20]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2019-20
- Sar Business Tradelink Private Limited… vs Income Tax Officer, Ward - 1(2), RaipurITA 599/RPR/2026[2014-15]Status: Heard21 Oct 2026AY 2014-15
- Tarunaben Maganlal Bhut, Navagam vs ITO Ward 2(2)(1), RajkotITA 673/RJT/2026[2024-25]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2024-25
- Neo Incorporation, Rajkot vs DCIT Circle- 1(2), RajkotITA 471/RJT/2026[2012-2013]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2012-2013
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S.Sri Satya Sai Constructions vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 27 Oct 2026
- M/S. Sikka Motors PVT LTD vs. Union Of INDIA & Anr.Delhi · 27 Oct 2026
- Shri Yaras Suresh Babu Prabhu Kumar vs. The Union Of INDIATelangana · 27 Oct 2026
- Santa Singh vs. SuperintendentUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026
- Azaad Builders vs. Assistant Commissioner SGSTUttarakhand · 27 Oct 2026