M/S O.F.BOARD CO-OPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-35(1), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that deductions admissible under Chapter VI-A, including Section 80P, also encompass disallowances made under sections like 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3) as they relate to business activity. Therefore, the expenses were eligible for deduction under Section 80P.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative credit society, appealed against disallowances made under sections 40(a)(ia) and 40A(3) for salary and other expenses. These disallowances were made by the lower authorities.
What were the issues?
Whether disallowances made under Section 40(a)(ia) and Section 40A(3) are eligible for deduction under Section 80P for a cooperative credit society.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B(SMC
Before: Shri Satbeer Singh Godara
The assessee’s appeal for assessment year 2014-15, arises against the ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-10, Kolkata’s order dated 28.02.2019 passed in the case No. 283/CIT(A)-10/W, 35(1)/14-15/2016- 17/Kol, involving proceedings under section 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961; in short ‘the Act’. Heard both the parties. Case file perused.
It transpires from the case records that the assessee’s only grievance per its averments is that both the lower authorities have erred in law and on facts in making disallowances under section 40(a)(ia) and section 40A(3) on account of salary and other expenses involving sums of Rs.26,02,310/- and Rs.21,475/- respectively.
Assessment Year: 2014-2015 M/s. O.F. Board Cooperative Credit Society Limited
There is no dispute between the parties that the assessee has been assessed to tax as a cooperative credit society and entitled for deduction under section 80P. In this factual background, I notice during the course of hearing that the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Department of Revenue, Central Board of Direct Taxes has issued a circular bearing No. 37/2016 dated 02.11.2016 making it clear that all deductions admissible in Chapter VI-A also include various disallowances/additions made under sections 32, 40(a)(ia), 40A(3), 43B, etc. since related to business activity. I, therefore, decline the Revenue’s arguments supporting the impugned disallowances and direct the Assessing Officer to treat the foregoing two heads under ‘salary’ and ‘other expenses’ as eligible for deduction under section 80P as per law.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed. Order pronounced in the open Court on January 31, 2020.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(ia)
- Rekha Agarwal, Jaipur vs ITO WD 4(1), JaipurITA 844/JPR/2025[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Oct 2026AY 2021-22
- Cdg Petchem Limited, Hyderabad vs ITO, Ward - 1(1), HyderabadITA 1900/HYD/2025[2018-2019]Status: Disposed16 Oct 2026AY 2018-2019
- M/S. Shree Laminators Ltd., Kolkata vs DCIT, Circle 4(4), KolkataITA 1534/KOL/2026[2011-2012]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2011-2012
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1493/KOL/2026[2015-2016]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2015-2016
- J.D. Marketing, Kolkata vs ITO, Ward 37(1), KolkataITA 1492/KOL/2026[2013-2014]Status: Disposed15 Oct 2026AY 2013-2014
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Sushama Mishra vs. The Commissioner Of CT And GST, Odisha, KatakOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- Saudamini Samantray vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Bhubaneswar IiOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Keshav Rice Mill, Ganjam vs. Chief Commissioner, CT And GST, Odisha, KatakaOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S. Nanda Contruction PVT. LTD., Angul vs. Additional Commissioner, GST And Central Excise Commissionerate, SundergarhOrissa · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Utkal Suppliers,Ganjam vs. Assistant Commissioner Of CT And GST, Ganjam-I Circle,GanjamOrissa · 28 Oct 2026