AKANKSHA SEVA SADAN,MUZAFFARPUR vs. CIT EXEMPTION, PATNA
Facts
The appeals were filed against the orders of the CIT(E) rejecting applications for registration u/s 12AB and 80G. The rejection was based on the ground that details called for by the CIT(E) were not supplied by the assessee. The assessee cited the illness of the Secretary as the reason for non-compliance.
Held
The Tribunal felt that in the interest of substantive justice, the matters deserved to be remanded back to the file of the CIT(E) for fresh consideration, granting the assessee an opportunity to present the facts and provide the information sought.
Key Issues
Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the applications for registration due to non-compliance, and whether the assessee should be granted an opportunity for a fresh hearing.
Sections Cited
12AB, 80G, 12A
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “SMC” BENCH PATNA
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “SMC” BENCH PATNA (VIRTUAL HEARING AT KOLKATA)
SHRI GEORGE MATHAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER SHRI SANJAY AWASTHI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. Nos. 35 & 36/Pat/2025
Akanksha Seva Sadan, Mudapur Choubey, Kharauna Dih, Muzaffarpur - 843113 [PAN: AAATA6994R] ..................…...…………….... Appellant vs. CIT (Exemption), Patna ............…..…....................... Respondent
Appearances by: Assessee represented by : Vikash Kr. Singh, CA Department represented by : Shri Ashwani Kr. Singal, JCIT Date of concluding the hearing : 27.02.2025 Date of pronouncing the order : 27.02.2025
ORDER PER BENCH
This is a batch of two appeals arises from the orders of the Ld. Commissioner of Income-tax (Exemption), Patna (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(E)”], vide order dated 04.12.2024 for AY 2017-18. These two cases pertain to orders rejecting the application for grant of registration u/s 12AB and 80G of the Act. Since, these two matters are inter-connected and belong to the same assessee, the same are being disposed of through a common order.
1.1 In both the appeals, the Ld. CIT(E) has rejected the concerned applications on the ground that details called for by him were not
I.T.A. No. 35&36/Pat/2025 Akanksha Seva Sadan supplied. On this account, the assessee has mentioned the relevant factors on account of which he could not file the necessary details as under: “An application in Form 10AB was filed on 29.06.2024 by the applicant, Akanksha Seva Sadan, for grant of regular registration under sub clause (iii) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A of the Income Tax Act 1961 (The Act herein after) read with section 12AB(1)(b). The address of the Society is at Muzaffarpur, Bihar. In the course of proceedings taken u/s 12AB, in order to examine the objects of the applicant and the genuineness of its activities and the compliance of such requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the Trust or institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects, but as the concerned person the Secretary of the Society was not in good health so she couldn't check the message and consequently couldn't respond to the said notice. We're attaching herewith the supportings in the respect. Hence the learned officer with view of non-compliance of the said notice rejected the application. Also, the provisional registration granted under sub clause (vi) of clause (ac) of sub-section (1) of section 12A in Form 10AC dated 27.05.2021 with Unique Registration Number-AAATA6994RE20206 for AY 2021-22 to 2023-24 is also cancelled through DIN ITBA/EXM/F/EXM45/2024- 25/1070875208(1) dt 04th Dec 2024. Since the proper opportunity of being heard is not available to the us so it is requested to remand back to the CIT Exemption, Patna So that we could provide the information sought by the learned officer.”
1.3 The extract above is common for both the appeals and there are supporting medical certificates.
During the course of hearing, the Ld. AR prayed for an opportunity to present the facts before the Ld. CIT(E). The Ld. DR had no objection in case this matter was to be remanded back to the file of Ld. CIT(E).
3.1 On a consideration of the facts and documents in these cases, we feel that in the interest of substantive justice, these two matters deserve to be remanded back to the file of Ld. CIT(E) for fresh consideration. We direct accordingly.
This finding pertains to ITA No. 35/Pat/2025. However, this will apply mutatis mutandis to ITA No. 36/Pat/2025 as well.
I.T.A. No. 35&36/Pat/2025 Akanksha Seva Sadan 5. In the result, these two appeals filed by the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.
Order pronounced in the court on 27.02.2025
Sd/- Sd/- [Sanjay Awasthi] [George Mathan] Accountant Member Judicial Member Dated: 27.02.2025 AK, PS Copy of the order forwarded to: 1. Akanksha Seva Sadan 2. CIT (Exemption), Patna 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- 5. CIT(DR)
//True copy// By order
Assistant Registrar, Kolkata Benches
