No AI summary yet for this case.
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, “D” Bench, Mumbai
Before: Shri Shamim Yahya & Shri Ravish Sood
PER RAVISH SOOD, JM The present appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order passed by the CIT(A)-54, Mumbai, dated 07.02.2017, which in turn arises from the order passed by the A.O under Sec.144 r.w.s 153A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short ‘Act’), dated 26.03.2015. 2. The ld. Authorized Representative for the assessee (for short ‘A.R’), at the very outset of the hearing of the appeal submitted that the assessee seeks to withdraw the present appeal. The ld. Departmental Representative (for short ‘D.R’) did not object to the withdrawal of the appeal as was sought by the assessee. Accordingly,
P a g e | 2 ITA No.5014/Mum/2017 AY. 2011-12 Mr. Mihir Nerurkar Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, CC-6(2) in the backdrop of the aforesaid concession on the part of the ld. A.R, the present appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
The appeal of the assessee is dismissed as not pressed. Order pronounced in the open court on 26.06.2019 (Shamim Yahya) (Ravish Sood) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER भ ुंफई Mumbai; ददन ुंक 26.06.2019 Ps. Rohit
आदेश की प्रतिलऱपि अग्रेपिि/Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. अऩीर थी / The Appellant 2. प्रत्मथी / The Respondent. आमकय आम क्त(अऩीर) / The CIT(A)- 3. आमकय आम क्त / CIT 4. विब गीम प्रतततनधध, आमकय अऩीरीम अधधकयण, भ ुंफई /
DR, ITAT, Mumbai ग र्ड प ईर / Guard file. 6. सत्म वऩत प्रतत //// आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, उि/सहायक िंजीकार (Dy./Asstt.