NOBEL AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED,KANCHEEPURAM vs. DCIT, CORP CIRCLE 4(1), CHENNAI
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal noted that the additions were primarily due to a lack of supporting evidence. The assessee has now provided additional evidence for all three additions. The Tribunal found this evidence material and relevant to the issues.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a company engaged in manufacturing auto parts, filed a NIL income return for AY 2022-23. The AO made additions for disallowed deductions, expenditure to Orhan Holding AS, and ledger discrepancies with Raymond Fastners India Private Limited. The CIT(A) confirmed these additions.
What were the issues?
Whether the additions made by the AO and confirmed by the CIT(A) for want of supporting evidence are sustainable, or if the additional evidence produced warrants a fresh examination by the AO.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘C’ BENCH, CHENNAI
Before: SHRI ABY T VARKEY & SHRI S.R. RAGHUNATHA
PER S. R. RAGHUNATHA, AM:
The present appeal of the assessee is directed against the order dated 21.05.2025 passed by the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld.CIT(A)”), arising from the assessment order dated 26.03.2024 passed by the National Faceless Assessment Centre (hereinafter referred to as the “AO”) u/s.143(3) of the Income-ta
The order continues below.
Read the full judgment
A free account opens 10 full judgments a month. Re-reading one you have already opened does not count again.
The summary, the parties, the sections and the citations above are open to everyone and always will be. Only the text of the order and the PDF are metered.
More judgments on Section 40(a)(i)
- M/S American Express Bank Ltd., Mumbai vs The Jt DIT (It)1(1), MumbaiITA 9414/MUM/2004[2000-2001]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-2001
- DDIT(It)- 1(1), Mumbai vs M/S. American Express Bank Ltd., MumbaiITA 5667/MUM/2004[2000-01]Status: Disposed8 Oct 2026AY 2000-01
- Eurofins Peenya Resources Private Limited… vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax…ITA 1116/BANG/2023[2016-17]Status: Disposed28 Sept 2026AY 2016-17
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6199/DEL/2026[2021-22]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2021-22
- Azure Green Tech Private Limited, Delhi vs Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax, Circle…ITA 6198/DEL/2026[2020-21]Status: Disposed21 Sept 2026AY 2020-21
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- A.Merchy Clara vs. The Commissioner Of GST And Central Excise (Appeals)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- Nallathambi Thangaraj vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - IMadras · 13 Oct 2026
- Iyyanan Eswaran vs. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (St) (GST)Madras · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S. Hira Films PVT. LTD. vs. M/S. Prasad Film Labs (Mumbai) Private LimitedBombay · 13 Oct 2026
- M/S Jung Bahadur Singh, Through Its Proprietor, Jang Bahadur Singh vs. The Union Of INDIA, Through Its Secretary, Ministry Of Finance, Department Of RevenueJharkhand · 13 Oct 2026