INDRA DEVI,MUZAFFARPUR vs. AC/DC, CENT. CIR, MUZAFFARPUR, MUZAFFARPUR

PDF
ITA 489/PAT/2024Status: DisposedITAT Patna11 March 2025AY 2014-15Bench: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR (Accountant Member), SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY (Judicial Member)1 pages
AI SummaryAllowed

Facts

The assessee preferred appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals). Neither the assessee nor their Authorized Representative appeared before the Bench for hearing, nor was any adjournment application filed. The appeals were heard ex-parte with the assistance of the DR.

Held

The Tribunal noted that the assessee had not appeared before any of the lower authorities. However, in the interest of natural justice and for the ends of justice, the assessee was granted one more opportunity. The appeals were restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for a decision on merit after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.

Key Issues

Whether the assessee is entitled to an opportunity of hearing before the Assessing Officer after having failed to appear before the lower authorities.

Sections Cited

147, 144

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, ‘PATNA’ BENCH, PATNA

Before: SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, AM & SHRI PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY, JM

For Respondent: Shri Rinku Singh, DR
Hearing: 04.03.2025Pronounced: 12.03.2025

PER BENCH:

This is an appeal preferred by the assessee against the order of the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals), Patna-3 (hereinafter referred to as the “Ld. CIT(A)”] dated 27.05.2024 for the AY 2013-14.

2.

At the time of hearing neither the assessee nor the ld. AR appeared before the Bench to attend these appeals nor any adjournment application was moved by the assessee. Therefore, these appeals are heard and disposed off with the assistance of ld. DR, who pointed out that the assessee had not appeared before any of the authorities below and stated that these appeals may be restored to the file of the ld. CIT (A).

4.

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes.

Order pronounced in the open court on 12.03.2025.

Sd/- Sd/- (PRADIP KUMAR CHOUBEY) (RAJESH KUMAR) (JUDICIAL MEMBER) (ACCOUNTANT MEMBER) Kolkata, Dated: 12.03.2025 Sudip Sarkar, Sr.PS

Sr. Private Secretary/ Asst. Registrar Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Patna

INDRA DEVI,MUZAFFARPUR vs AC/DC, CENT. CIR, MUZAFFARPUR, MUZAFFARPUR | BharatTax