M/S ENVIRON SOLAR (P) LTD.,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-13(1), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2604/KOL/2019Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 February 2020AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication. The Assessing Officer is to verify the facts and determine the correct turnover after providing the assessee with an adequate opportunity of being heard.

What were the facts?

The assessee's appeal was against the CIT(A)'s order for AY 2015-16. The assessee contended that the Assessing Officer determined a higher turnover based on excess TDS deduction by the payer, which was accepted by the payer.

What were the issues?

Whether the turnover was correctly determined by the Assessing Officer based on excess TDS deduction, and if verification is required.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘A’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara

order : February 19th, 2020 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 5, Kolkata, (hereinafter the “ld.CIT(A)”), passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 07/11/2019, for the Assessment Year 2015-16.

2.

We have heard rival contentions. On careful consideration of the facts and circumstances of the case, perusal of the papers on record, orders of the authorities below as well as case law cited, we hold as follows:- 3. The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that there was an excess deduction of TDS by the payer. He submitted that this fact of having deducted TDS in excess than what was legally required to be done, is accepted by the payer. He pointed out that the Assessing Officer based on such excess deduction of TDS , determined the turnover of the assessee at a higher figure than what was the actual turnover. He prayed that the matter may be restored to the file of the Assessing Officer to verify the facts and arrive at the correct turnover.

4.

The ld. D/R had no objection in the matter being restored to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication and determination of the correct turnover.

Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Environ Solar (P) Ltd.

5.

In view of the above submissions, we set aside the matter to th In view of the above submissions, we set aside the matter to th In view of the above submissions, we set aside the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, in accordance with law, after giving the assessee Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, in accordance with law, after giving the assessee Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication, in accordance with law, after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard. adequate opportunity of being heard.

6.

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.

Kolkata, the Kolkata, the 19th day of February, 2020 20.

1.

Sd/- Sd/- [S.S. Godara] [J. Sudhakar Reddy J. Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Accountant Member Dated : 19.02.2020 {SC SPS} Copy of the order forwarded to:

1. 1. M/s. Environ Solar (P) Ltd 60A, D.H. Road Thakurpur Kolkata – 700 063 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-13(1), Kolkata 13(1), Kolkata 3.CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.

5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →