KAMLESH PRASAD GUPTA,KOLKATA vs. I.T.O.,WARD-40(3), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal restored the matter to the file of the Assessing Officer for fresh adjudication on merits. The assessee was to be given an adequate opportunity of being heard.
What were the facts?
The assessee's appeal before the CIT(A) was decided ex-parte due to the assessee's non-appearance. The CIT(A) did not decide the case on merits. The assessee requested the matter be restored to the AO for proper examination.
What were the issues?
Whether the CIT(A) erred in passing an ex-parte order without disposing of the case on merits. Whether the matter should be restored to the AO for proper examination of facts and evidence.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘SMC’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy]
order
: February 19th, 2020 ORDER
Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM:
This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Kolkata [‘CIT(A)’ for short] dated 05.04.2019 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) for AY 2015-16.
The ld. CIT(A) passed an ex-parte order on the ground that the assessee has not appeared before him. He did not dispose off the case on merits. 3. Be it as it may, I find that in this case, the issues are such that would require examination of evidences and facts by the AO. The assessee has submitted before me that the matter be restored to the file of the AO as it would enable him to explain the issues in the proper perspective. 4. The ld. DR had no objection to the same. 5. Under these circumstances, I restore the matter to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication on merits in accordance with law after giving the assessee adequate opportunity of being heard.
Assessment Years: 2015-16 Kamlesh Prasad Gupta. 6. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes.
Kolkata, the 19th February, 2020.
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- Capri Global Capital LTD Through Represented By Its Law Officer Mr. Varun Kaljoria vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh Through Principal SecretaryMadhya Pradesh · 26 Oct 2026
- Sri Tatiparthy Venkata Swamy vs. The State Of Andhra PradeshAndhra Pradesh · 25 Oct 2026
- Piyush Shantilal Veera vs. State Of U.P.Allahabad · 23 Oct 2026
- Tvl. Pooja Shri Traders vs. The Deputy State Tax Officer - 1Madras · 23 Oct 2026
- Aashutosh vs. The State Of Madhy PradeshMadhya Pradesh · 23 Oct 2026