LIFE LINE ENGINEERS COOPERATIVE AND CONSTRUCTION SOCIETY LTD.,ASHOKNAGAR vs. I.T.O.WARD-33(2), KOLKATA
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal condoned the delay in filing the appeal before it. Following a coordinate bench's decision, the Tribunal set aside the CIT(Appeals)'s order and directed the assessee to file the appeal electronically, with the CIT(Appeals) to decide it on merits.
What were the facts?
The assessee, a cooperative society, filed an appeal manually before the CIT(Appeals). The CIT(Appeals) dismissed the appeal as non-est because it was not filed electronically as mandated. The assessee then filed an appeal before the ITAT with a significant delay.
What were the issues?
Whether an appeal filed manually, when electronic filing is mandatory, can be treated as non-est. Whether the CIT(Appeals) should decide the appeal on merits after directing electronic filing.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C(SMC
Before: Shri P.M. Jagtap, Vice-
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-9, Kolkata dated 14.09.2018 passed ex-parte, whereby he dismissed the appeal filed by the assessee manually by treating the same as non-est on the ground that it was mandatory on the part of the assessee to file the said appeal electronically on-line.
At the outset, it is noted that there is a delay of 181 days on the part of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. In this regard, the assessee has moved an application seeking condonation of the said delay and keeping in view the reasons given therein, I am satisfied that there was a sufficient cause for the delay of 181 days on the part of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal. Even the ld. D.R. has not raised any objection in this regard. The delay of 181 days on the part Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Life Line Engineers Cooperative & Construction Society Limited of the assessee in filing this appeal before the Tribunal is accordingly condoned.
The assessee in the present case is a Cooperative Society, while filed its return of income for the year under consideration on 17.05.2015 declaring total income of Rs.60,380/-. In the assessment completed under section 143(3) vide an order dated 26.12.2016, the total income of the assessee was determined by the Assessing Officer at Rs.10,40,515/- after making an addition of Rs.9,80,135/- on account of undisclosed income.
Against the order passed by the Assessing Officer under section 143(3), an appeal was filed by the assessee before the ld. CIT(Appeals). Since the said appeal was filed by the assessee manually and it was mandatory on the part of the assessee to file the appeal electronically on- line, the ld. CIT(Appeals) treated the appeal filed by the assessee manually as non-est and dismissed the same vide his appellate order dated 14.09.2018 passed ex-parte. Aggrieved by the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals), the assessee has preferred this appeal before the Tribunal.
I have heard the arguments of both the sides and also perused the relevant material available on record. It is observed that a similar issue as involved in the present case had come up for consideration before the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal at Mumbai in the case of All India Federation of Tax Practitioners –vs.- ITO and vide its order dated 04.05.2018 passed in ITA No. 7134/Mum./2017, the order of the ld. CIT(Appeals) dismissing the appeal of the assessee filed manually by treating the same as non-est was set aside by the Tribunal keeping in view the cause of justice with a direction to the assessee to file the appeal electronically within 10 days from the date of receipt of order. The Tribunal also condoned the eventual delay that may cause in filing the appeal by the assessee electronically on-line and directed the ld. CIT(Appeals) to dispose of the said appeal filed by the assessee on merits Assessment Year: 2014-2015 Life Line Engineers Cooperative & Construction Society Limited by passing a speaking order. Respectfully following the said decision of the Coordinate Bench of this Tribunal, I set aside the impugned order passed by the ld. CIT(Appeals) dismissing the appeal filed by the assessee manually by treating the same as non-est and direct the assessee to file a fresh appeal electronically on-line within 10 days of receipt of this order. In case the appeal is filed by the assessee electronically in compliance with the said direction, the ld. CIT(Appeals) shall condone the eventual delay in filing the same and dispose of the said appeal filed by the assessee on merit after giving the assessee proper and sufficient opportunity of being heard.
In the result, the appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes. Order pronounced in the open Court on February 19, 2020.
Latest GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- R.K.Service Station, Balasore vs. Commissioner CT And GST Odisha, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- Tankala Soumya vs. Assistant Commissioner Of State Tax, CT And GST, Rayagada Circle, RayagadaOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Pooja, Town Hallroad, Cuttack vs. State Tax Officer, Cuttack-I West Circle,CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Chicvogue Fashions Lip, Ganjam vs. State Tax Officer Bhubaneswar- Ii CircleOrissa · 31 Oct 2026
- M/S Priya, Townhall Road, Cuttack vs. Superintendent Cuttack- I Range, CuttackOrissa · 31 Oct 2026