M/S. RASHA IND. PVT. LTD.,KOLKATA vs. DCIT, CIRCLE - 4(2), KOLKATA

PDF · subscribers
ITA 2674/KOL/2018Status: DisposedITAT Kolkata19 February 2020AY 2015-162 pages
AI SummaryRemanded

What did the Tribunal hold?

The Tribunal restored the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication. The AO was directed to verify the assessee's claim of double addition and the assessee undertook to produce books of accounts for all relevant years.

What were the facts?

The Assessing Officer (AO) passed a best-judgment assessment order, rejecting the assessee's books of accounts. The assessee claimed that the AO's order resulted in double addition of income by taxing turnover already accounted for and taxed in a prior assessment year.

What were the issues?

Whether the AO's best-judgment assessment resulted in double taxation of turnover already taxed in a previous year.

Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?

Section 250

AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below

Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘C’ BENCH, KOLKATA

Before: Shri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Shri Aby. T. Varkey]

order : February 19th, 2020 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :- This is an appeal filed by the assessee directed against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-2, Kolkata [‘CIT(A)’ for short] dated 15.10.2018 u/s 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (‘the Act’ for short) for AY 2015-16.

2.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that, the AO passed a best-judgment assessment order by rejecting the books of accounts and in that process had considered the turnover, based on the claims made by the assessee for credit of tax deducted at source. He submitted that turnover pertaining to some of the claims of credit of TDS have been accounted for by the assessee in the earlier assessment year and that the order of the AO bringing to tax income on such turn over which was already disclosed and taxed in the earlier assessment year, resulted in double addition. He submitted a paper book in support of his contentions and requested that the matter be set aside to the file of the AO for fresh verification and adjudication in accordance with law and specifically for verifying this claim of the assessee of double addition.

3.

The ld. DR submitted that the assessee had not produced his books of account before the lower authorities and that the issue may be restored to the file of the AO for Assessment Year: 2015-16 M/s. Rasha Ind. Pvt. Ltd. verifying the claim of the assessee and submitted that at the same time a specific direction be given to the assessee to produce not only the books of the current year before the AO but also the books of the previous years in which the turnover in question relatable to the TDS credit claim in this year has been accounted for.

4.

The ld. Counsel for the assessee undertook to produce the books of accounts for all the years as may be directed by the AO to enable such verification.

5.

In view of the above, we restore the issue to the file of the AO for fresh adjudication in accordance with law.

6.

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes. Kolkata, the 19th February, 2020.

Recent GST High Court judgments

Search GST case law →