SHRI ANUP KUMAR MITRA,KOLKATA vs. ITO, WD-44(1), KOLKATA, KOLKATA
In favour of the assessee: the assessee's appeal was allowed. From the AI summary of this appeal.
What did the Tribunal hold?
The Tribunal held that a plain reading of Section 214, as it existed for the relevant assessment year, mandates that interest on refund is to be calculated from the 1st day of April of the financial year. The Assessing Officer was directed to recompute the interest accordingly.
What were the facts?
The assessee appealed an order concerning the calculation of interest on refund under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act for the Assessment Year 1987-88. The core dispute was whether interest should be granted from the first day of the financial year.
What were the issues?
The primary issue was the correct starting date for calculating interest on refund under Section 214 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 1987-88.
Which sections of the Income-tax Act were involved?
AI-generated summary — verify with the full judgment below
Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA
Before: Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy & Sri S.S. Godara
IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL KOLKATA ‘B’ BENCH, KOLKATA (Before Sri J. Sudhakar Reddy, Accountant Member & Sri S.S. Godara, Judicial Member) Assessment Year: 1987-88 Shri Anup Kumar Mitra...............…………........................................................……………….…......Appellant L/H. Of Lt. Anil Bhusan Mitra 6, Bepin Mitra Lane Kolkata – 700 004 [PAN : AEAPM 6798 P] Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-44(1), Kolkata……………...................................….………....…....Respondent Appearances by: Shri S.M. Surana, Advocate, appeared on behalf of the assessee. Shri Dhrubajyoti Ray, JCIT Sr. D/R, appearing on behalf of the Revenue. Date of concluding the hearing : December 12th, 2019 Date of pronouncing the order : February 26th, 2020 ORDER Per J. Sudhakar Reddy, AM :-
This appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order of the Learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) – 13, Kolkata, (hereinafter the “ld.CIT(A)”), passed u/s. 250 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the ‘Act’), dt. 18/01/2016, for the Assessment Year 1987-88.
The only issue that arises for our consideration is, whether the interest on refund u/s 214 of the Act, as it existed for the Assessment Year 1987-88, entitles the assessee for grant of interest on refund due, from the first date of the financial year. Section 214 of the Act, as it then existed, reads as follows:- “Section 214”- Interest payable by Government – (1) The Central Government shall pay simple interest at fifteen per cent per annum on the amount by which the aggregate sum of any instalments of advance tax paid during any financial year in which they are payable under sections 207 to 213 exceeds the amount of the assessed tax from the 1st day of April nest following the said financial year, and where any such instalment is paid after the expiry of the financial year, during which it is payable by reason of the provisions of Section 213, interest as aforesaid shall also be payable on that instalment from the date of its payment to the date of regular assessment : Provided that in respect of any amount refunded on a provisional assessment under section 141A, no interest shall be paid for any period after the date of such provisional assessment.”
A plain reading of the Section takes us to the conclusion that the interest has to be calculated from the 1st day of April of the financial year. Not doing so, is a mistake apparent on record. Thus, we allow the appeal of the assessee and direct the Assessing Assessment Year: 1987-88 Shri Anup Kumar Mitra Officer to compute interest u/s 214 of the Act on the Officer to compute interest u/s 214 of the Act on the amount of aggregate sum of amount of aggregate sum of instalments paid as advance tax by the assessee instalments paid as advance tax by the assessee during the financial year, during the financial year, which exceeds the amount of assessed tax.
In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed.
Kolkata, the Kolkata, the 26th day of February, 2020. Sd/- Sd/- [S.S. Godara] [J. Sudhakar Reddy Sudhakar Reddy] Judicial Member Accountant Member Accountant Member Dated : 26.02.2020 {SC SPS} Copy of the order forwarded to:
1. 1. Shri Anup Kumar Mitra L/H. Of Lt. Anil Bhusan Mitra 6, Bepin Mitra Lane Kolkata – 700 004 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward-44(1), Kolkata 44(1), Kolkata 3. CIT(A)- 4. CIT- , 5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
5. CIT(DR), Kolkata Benches, Kolkata.
More judgments on Section 214
- The Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax vs M/S Syndicate BankITA/69/201823 Dec 2020
- The Pr.Commissioner of Income-Tax vs M/S Syndicate BankITA/70/201823 Dec 2020
- The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/S Syndicate BankITA/806/201723 Dec 2020
- The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/S Syndicate BankITA/810/201718 Dec 2020
- The Pr Commissioner of Income Tax vs M/S Syndicate BankITA/807/201718 Dec 2020
Recent GST High Court judgments
Search GST case law →- M/S. Rohit Medical Systems vs. Commissioner Of Delhi Goods And Services Tax And Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Manoj Kumar Prop M K Steel Traders vs. Additional Commissioner, Central Goods And Services Tax & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Shivam Kumar vs. The State Of BiharPatna · 28 Oct 2026
- M/S Rajkalpana Travels PVT. LTD. vs. Commissioner CGST, Delhi North CommissionerateDelhi · 28 Oct 2026
- Mahaveer Ispat Traders vs. Principal Commissioner Dgst Delhi Department Of Trade And Taxes Gnctd & Anr.Delhi · 28 Oct 2026