HARSH VARDHAN GOYAL HUF,DELHI vs. ITO, WARD 2(1), DELHI

PER AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA, AM

The appeal filed by the assessee is directed against the order dated 29.01.2024 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals),
National Faceless Appeal Centre (NFAC), New Delhi [In Short ‘the CIT(A)’].
2. At the time of hearing before us, The Ld. Authorised
Representative (hereinafter, the ‘AR’) submitted an application dated
24.01.2025, which reads as under:
Page 2 of 4

“We have filed the above appeal on 19.03.2024. Subsequently, for settlement of the disputes involved in appeal, we have filed application under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme, 2024,
Copy of application filed (Form1) is attached herewith. The designated authority has also issued Form 2 copy if which is attached.
In terms of the provisions of the aforesaid scheme, we are required to file a communication to the designated authority (Juri ictional
A.O./ CIT) that I have filed communication to the concerned appellate authority for withdrawal of the appeal in relation to which application has been filed under The Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas
Scheme, 2024,
Accordingly, we are intimating to your honour about withdrawal of captioned appeal. So you are requested to do the needful.”
3. We have heard both parties and have perused material available on the record. The above application is self-explanatory. We find that the assessee wants to withdraw the present appeal. The Ld. Senior
Departmental Representative has not had any objection to that.
Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn and not pressed.
5. In view of the above, the appeal of the assessee stands dismissed as withdrawn.

Order pronounced in open Court on 27th January, 2025 (YOGESH KUMAR US) (AVDHESH KUMAR MISHRA)
JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER

Dated: 27/01/2024
Binita, Sr. PS
Page 3 of 4